CredScore verdict
0x3048…c0d7ethereumScore
21
0 = max risk · 100 = clean
High riskEscalateConfidence:44%
Escalate for deeper review
CredScore sees a 9.1-year-old wallet with 42 transfers. Sanctions-sensitive exposure context and High inbound value concentration are severe enough to require escalation before any further interaction.
Wallet snapshot
Wallet age
9.1 years
Transfers observed
42
Last activity
1 months ago
Counterparties
33
Primary risk drivers
Sanctions-sensitive exposure context
Sanctioned counterparty interactions observed: 1 · Observed labels: transfer, Wrapped Ether (WETH)
Sanctions-sensitive attribution materially increases review urgency because legal and compliance context becomes critical.
High inbound value concentration
Single source supplied 97% of inbound ETH value · Distinct inbound counterparties (all assets): 25
A large share of inbound value is concentrated in a few transfers, which can indicate a single large unexplained windfall.
Balance unavailable
Native balance: Unknown
Missing core metrics reduce confidence and increase the chance of misclassification.
Sanctioned counterparty interactions
Observed entity context
Labels
transferWrapped Ether (WETH)
Protocols
Null / Burn AddressEthereum FoundationWrapped Ether (WETH)
Offsetting factors
Established history
Wallet age: 9.1y (observed)
Observable activity present
Transfers observed: 42
Moderately distributed counterparties
Unique counterparties observed: 33
Analyst briefing
Executive Risk Verdict
This address presents elevated counterparty risk. Sanctions-sensitive exposure context and High inbound value concentration compose adverse signal severe enough to justify escalation under current coverage.
Decision Posture
Escalate for deeper review. A specific high-risk signal combination was detected (sanctions exposure). This pattern is materially more concerning than any individual flag in isolation and requires human context to resolve correctly.
Primary Risk Drivers
Sanctions-sensitive exposure context Sanctioned counterparty interactions observed: 1 Observed labels: transfer, Wrapped Ether (WETH) Sanctions-sensitive attribution materially increases review urgency because legal and compliance context becomes critical.
High inbound value concentration
Single source supplied 97% of inbound ETH value
Distinct inbound counterparties (all assets): 25
A large share of inbound value is concentrated in a few transfers, which can indicate a single large unexplained windfall.
Balance unavailable
Native balance: Unknown
Missing core metrics reduce confidence and increase the chance of misclassification.
Offsetting Factors
Established history Wallet age: 9.1y (observed)
Observable activity present
Transfers observed: 42
Moderately distributed counterparties
Unique counterparties observed: 33
Behavior Distribution
Attributed interactions: 100% of observed activity, but only 0% resolved with high confidence, the remainder are unlabeled contract interactions, which is opacity rather than meaningful attribution coverage. High-confidence attributed interactions: 0% of observed activity.
Observed Entity / Protocol Context
transfer Wrapped Ether (WETH)
Observed Protocol Attribution
Null / Burn Address Ethereum Foundation Wrapped Ether (WETH)
Confidence Statement
Overall assessment confidence is low (44%), constrained by limited coverage, short history, or sparse behavioral signal.
Sensitivity notes
Improved data coverage for missing core metrics would likely improve confidence and may affect the trust score.
For analysts
Generate a Defensible Verdict Report — engine version + timestamp baked in, exportable as PDF or copy-pasted as Markdown into a SAR narrative or case file.
Run your own wallet through CredScore
Deterministic Ethereum wallet risk scoring with a full audit trail. Every signal has an explicit numeric weight, output is reproducible. Paste any wallet to see your own verdict.
First analysis is free, no credit card. Or see pricing.
Shared Jul 12, 2026