CredScore verdict
0x6fac…b9c0ethereum
Score
12
0 = max risk · 100 = clean
High riskEscalateConfidence:54%
Escalate for deeper review
CredScore sees a 7.3-year-old wallet with 107 transfers. High-confidence sanctions attribution and High inbound value concentration are severe enough to require escalation before any further interaction.
Wallet snapshot
Wallet age
7.3 years
Transfers observed
107
Last activity
2 months ago
Counterparties
60
Primary risk drivers
High-confidence sanctions attribution
This wallet itself is on a sanctions watchlist (per the curated registry or OFAC SDN sync).
Sanctions-sensitive attribution materially increases review urgency because legal and compliance context becomes critical.
High inbound value concentration
Single source supplied 86% of inbound ETH value · Distinct inbound counterparties (all assets): 40
A large share of inbound value is concentrated in a few transfers, which can indicate a single large unexplained windfall.
Source return flow detected
Source return count: 3 · Repeated amount-band recirculation: 1 · Funding dependency concentration: 17% · Multi-hop pressure: 16/100
Observed sources later reappear as return destinations, which reduces legibility and suggests recirculating flow rather than clean one-direction settlement.
Sanctioned counterparty interactions
MESRI
0x6fac4d18c912343bf86fa7049364dd4e424ab9c0 ↗
OFAC_SDN · Synced from OFAC SDN CSV
Observed entity context
Labels
transfer
Protocols
USDT contractNull / Burn Address
Offsetting factors
Established history
Wallet age: 7.3y (observed)
Observable activity present
Transfers observed: 107
Moderately distributed counterparties
Unique counterparties observed: 60
Analyst briefing
Executive Risk Verdict
This address presents elevated counterparty risk. High-confidence sanctions attribution and High inbound value concentration compose adverse signal severe enough to justify escalation under current coverage.
Decision Posture
Escalate for deeper review. A specific high-risk signal combination was detected (sanctions self). This pattern is materially more concerning than any individual flag in isolation and requires human context to resolve correctly.
Primary Risk Drivers
High-confidence sanctions attribution This wallet itself is on a sanctions watchlist (per the curated registry or OFAC SDN sync). Sanctions-sensitive attribution materially increases review urgency because legal and compliance context becomes critical.
High inbound value concentration
Single source supplied 86% of inbound ETH value
Distinct inbound counterparties (all assets): 40
A large share of inbound value is concentrated in a few transfers, which can indicate a single large unexplained windfall.
Source return flow detected
Source return count: 3
Repeated amount-band recirculation: 1
Funding dependency concentration: 17%
Observed sources later reappear as return destinations, which reduces legibility and suggests recirculating flow rather than clean one-direction settlement.
Offsetting Factors
Established history Wallet age: 7.3y (observed)
Observable activity present
Transfers observed: 107
Moderately distributed counterparties
Unique counterparties observed: 60
Behavior Distribution
Exchange-related interactions: 2% of observed activity. Attributed interactions: 100% of observed activity, but only 0% resolved with high confidence, the remainder are unlabeled contract interactions, which is opacity rather than meaningful attribution coverage. High-confidence attributed interactions: 0% of observed activity.
Observed Entity / Protocol Context
transfer
Observed Protocol Attribution
USDT contract Null / Burn Address
Confidence Statement
Overall assessment confidence is moderate (54%), reflecting partial coverage with usable but still incomplete behavioral signal.
Sensitivity notes
Improved data coverage for missing core metrics would likely improve confidence and may affect the trust score.
The dormancy-reactivation pattern warrants direct inquiry, understanding what triggered resumed activity would substantially clarify the current behavioral picture.
For analysts
Generate a Defensible Verdict Report — engine version + timestamp baked in, exportable as PDF or copy-pasted as Markdown into a SAR narrative or case file.
Open report →
Run your own wallet through CredScore

Deterministic Ethereum wallet risk scoring with a full audit trail. Every signal has an explicit numeric weight, output is reproducible. Paste any wallet to see your own verdict.

First analysis is free, no credit card. Or see pricing.
Shared Oct 13, 2026