CredScore verdict
0xb507…4ad1eth-mainnet
Score
80
0 = max risk · 100 = clean
Low riskProceedConfidence:72%
Proceed with normal caution
CredScore sees a 3.4-year-old wallet with at least 501 transfers with observed context including transfer, approve. No dominant adverse drivers under current coverage; this case can proceed with normal caution.
Wallet snapshot
Wallet age
3.4 years
Transfers observed
501
Native balance
0.0000 ETH
Last activity
today
Counterparties
218
Observed entity context
Labels
transferapprove
Offsetting factors
Established history
Wallet age: 3.4y (observed)
Recognizable exchange or protocol context
Observed label: transfer · Observed label: approve
Observed activity context
Signals worth knowing about, but not strong enough to change the low-risk verdict above.
History capped by fetch limit
Transfers observed: At least 501 · History cap: observed count may be a lower bound (cap 500)
Incomplete transfer coverage reduces confidence because observed totals may be lower bounds.
High transfer activity
Transfers observed: At least 501 · History cap: observed count may be a lower bound (cap 500)
Higher activity increases interpretive complexity, but should not be treated as adverse on its own unless paired with suspicious concentration, rapid routing, or sensitive exposure.
High zero-value transfer ratio
Zero-value transfer share: 100%
A large share of zero-value transfers may indicate contract-heavy or low-signal activity, which lowers interpretability.
Analyst briefing
Executive Risk Verdict
This 3.4-year-old address presents lower relative counterparty risk. The observable behavior is consistent with stable usage and no dominant adverse drivers were detected, though it should still be contextualized with broader exposure intelligence when available.
Decision Posture
Proceed with normal caution. No dominant adverse drivers were identified under the current coverage, and the signal quality is strong enough to support a lower-risk routine posture.
Primary Risk Drivers
History capped by fetch limit Transfers observed: At least 501 History cap: observed count may be a lower bound (cap 500) Incomplete transfer coverage reduces confidence because observed totals may be lower bounds.
High transfer activity
Transfers observed: At least 501
History cap: observed count may be a lower bound (cap 500)
Higher activity increases interpretive complexity, but should not be treated as adverse on its own unless paired with suspicious concentration, rapid routing, or sensitive exposure.
High zero-value transfer ratio
Zero-value transfer share: 100%
A large share of zero-value transfers may indicate contract-heavy or low-signal activity, which lowers interpretability.
Offsetting Factors
Established history Wallet age: 3.4y (observed)
Recognizable exchange or protocol context
Observed label: transfer
Observed label: approve
Behavior Distribution
Exchange-related interactions: 1% of observed activity. Attributed interactions: 100% of observed activity, but only 0% resolved with high confidence, the remainder are unlabeled contract interactions, which is opacity rather than meaningful attribution coverage. High-confidence attributed interactions: 0% of observed activity.
Observed Entity / Protocol Context
transfer approve
Confidence Statement
Overall assessment confidence is high (72%), reflecting stronger sample depth, better coverage, and more stable observable behavior.
Sensitivity notes
Improved transaction coverage could materially change activity-based interpretation and increase confidence.
The dormancy-reactivation pattern warrants direct inquiry, understanding what triggered resumed activity would substantially clarify the current behavioral picture.
For analysts
Generate a Defensible Verdict Report — engine version + timestamp baked in, exportable as PDF or copy-pasted as Markdown into a SAR narrative or case file.
Open report →
Run your own wallet through CredScore

Deterministic Ethereum wallet risk scoring with a full audit trail. Every signal has an explicit numeric weight, output is reproducible. Paste any wallet to see your own verdict.

First analysis is free, no credit card. Or see pricing.
Shared Jul 27, 2026