CredScore verdict
0xb66c…95dbeth-mainnetScore
12
0 = max risk · 100 = clean
High riskEscalateConfidence:72%
Escalate for deeper review
CredScore sees a 3.3-year-old wallet with 1,140 transfers. Sanctions-sensitive exposure context and High-confidence sanctions attribution are severe enough to require escalation before any further interaction.
Wallet snapshot
Wallet age
3.3 years
Transfers observed
1,140
Native balance
0.0002 ETH
Last activity
1.2 years ago
Counterparties
432
Primary risk drivers
Sanctions-sensitive exposure context
Sanctioned counterparty interactions observed: 1 · Observed labels: Euler Finance Hack 2023, DAI contract, Ethereum Foundation
Sanctions-sensitive attribution materially increases review urgency because legal and compliance context becomes critical.
High-confidence sanctions attribution
Sanctioned counterparty interactions observed: 1
Sanctions-sensitive attribution materially increases review urgency because legal and compliance context becomes critical.
Hack / exploit proceeds attribution
This wallet is labeled as proceeds from a documented hack or exploit.
The wallet is labeled as proceeds from a documented hack or exploit, which is a hard escalation signal for compliance review.
Sanctioned counterparty interactions
Lazarus Group (DPRK)
0x098b716b8aaf21512996dc57eb0615e2383e2f96 ↗OFAC_SDN · Axie Infinity Ronin Bridge hack proceeds
Observed entity context
Labels
Euler Finance Hack 2023DAI contractEthereum FoundationUSDC contractNull / Burn Address
Protocols
DAI contractEthereum FoundationUSDC contractNull / Burn Address
Offsetting factors
Established history
Wallet age: 3.3y (observed)
Observable activity present
Transfers observed: 1,140
Recognizable exchange or protocol context
Observed label: Euler Finance Hack 2023 · Observed label: DAI contract · Observed label: Ethereum Foundation
Analyst briefing
Executive Risk Verdict
This address presents elevated counterparty risk. Sanctions-sensitive exposure context and High-confidence sanctions attribution compose adverse signal severe enough to justify escalation under current coverage.
Decision Posture
Escalate for deeper review. A specific high-risk signal combination was detected (sanctions self). This pattern is materially more concerning than any individual flag in isolation and requires human context to resolve correctly.
Primary Risk Drivers
Sanctions-sensitive exposure context Sanctioned counterparty interactions observed: 1 Observed labels: Euler Finance Hack 2023, DAI contract, Ethereum Foundation Sanctions-sensitive attribution materially increases review urgency because legal and compliance context becomes critical.
High-confidence sanctions attribution
Sanctioned counterparty interactions observed: 1
Sanctions-sensitive attribution materially increases review urgency because legal and compliance context becomes critical.
Hack / exploit proceeds attribution
This wallet is labeled as proceeds from a documented hack or exploit.
The wallet is labeled as proceeds from a documented hack or exploit, which is a hard escalation signal for compliance review.
Offsetting Factors
Established history Wallet age: 3.3y (observed)
Observable activity present
Transfers observed: 1,140
Recognizable exchange or protocol context
Observed label: Euler Finance Hack 2023
Observed label: DAI contract
Observed label: Ethereum Foundation
Structural Pattern Observations
Fan-out distribution (medium confidence) The observed flow pattern is consistent with fan-out distribution behavior and also carries additional review pressure from thin visibility, limited history, or sensitive exposure. This is not a misconduct finding, but it is not a routine pattern under current coverage.
Behavior Distribution
Attributed interactions: 1% of observed activity. High-confidence attributed interactions: 1% of observed activity.
Observed Entity / Protocol Context
Euler Finance Hack 2023 DAI contract Ethereum Foundation USDC contract Null / Burn Address
Observed Protocol Attribution
DAI contract Ethereum Foundation USDC contract Null / Burn Address
Confidence Statement
Overall assessment confidence is high (72%), reflecting stronger sample depth, better coverage, and more stable observable behavior.
Sensitivity notes
Fresh activity could change this classification because the current signal is not recent.
Stronger counterparty attribution coverage could materially improve interpretability and sharpen the current score.
Off-chain context would be particularly valuable here, the detected structural patterns raise interpretive ambiguity that on-chain data alone cannot resolve.
For analysts
Generate a Defensible Verdict Report — engine version + timestamp baked in, exportable as PDF or copy-pasted as Markdown into a SAR narrative or case file.
Run your own wallet through CredScore
Deterministic Ethereum wallet risk scoring with a full audit trail. Every signal has an explicit numeric weight, output is reproducible. Paste any wallet to see your own verdict.
First analysis is free, no credit card. Or see pricing.
Shared Jun 20, 2026