CredScore verdict
0x11e4…8ddaeth-mainnet
Score
77
0 = max risk · 100 = clean
Low riskReviewConfidence:62%
Review before proceeding
CredScore sees a 8.7-year-old wallet holding 2.5 ETH with at least 702 transfers. History capped by fetch limit and High transfer activity warrant manual review before this case is treated as routine. Observed entity context: USDC contract, Across Protocol Spoke Pool.
Wallet snapshot
Wallet age
8.7 years
Transfers observed
702
Native balance
2.53 ETH
Last activity
8 days ago
Counterparties
537
Observed entity context
Labels
USDC contractAcross Protocol Spoke PoolWrapped Ether (WETH)USDT contractENS Base Registrar
Protocols
USDC contractAcross Protocol Spoke PoolWrapped Ether (WETH)USDT contractENS Base Registrar
Offsetting factors
Established history
Wallet age: 8.7y (observed)
Recognizable exchange or protocol context
Observed label: USDC contract · Observed label: Across Protocol Spoke Pool · Observed label: Wrapped Ether (WETH)
Recognizable protocol attribution
Observed protocol: USDC contract · Observed protocol: Across Protocol Spoke Pool · Observed protocol: Wrapped Ether (WETH)
Observed activity context
Signals worth knowing about, but not strong enough to change the low-risk verdict above.
History capped by fetch limit
Transfers observed: At least 702 · History cap: observed count may be a lower bound (cap 800)
Incomplete transfer coverage reduces confidence because observed totals may be lower bounds.
High transfer activity
Transfers observed: At least 702 · History cap: observed count may be a lower bound (cap 800)
Higher activity increases interpretive complexity, but should not be treated as adverse on its own unless paired with suspicious concentration, rapid routing, or sensitive exposure.
Multi-venue operational context
Observed label: USDC contract · Observed label: Across Protocol Spoke Pool · Observed label: Wrapped Ether (WETH)
Recognizable bridge, exchange, or protocol context suggests a more legible operational workflow rather than a standalone adverse pattern.
Analyst briefing
Executive Risk Verdict
This 8.7-year-old address presents lower relative counterparty risk. The observable behavior is consistent with stable usage and no dominant adverse drivers were detected, though it should still be contextualized with broader exposure intelligence when available.
Decision Posture
Review before proceeding. One or more review-sensitive structural patterns were detected (Fan-out distribution), which elevates the review requirement beyond what the base risk tier alone would indicate. Human context is needed to interpret these findings correctly.
Primary Risk Drivers
History capped by fetch limit Transfers observed: At least 702 History cap: observed count may be a lower bound (cap 800) Incomplete transfer coverage reduces confidence because observed totals may be lower bounds.
High transfer activity
Transfers observed: At least 702
History cap: observed count may be a lower bound (cap 800)
Higher activity increases interpretive complexity, but should not be treated as adverse on its own unless paired with suspicious concentration, rapid routing, or sensitive exposure.
Multi-venue operational context
Observed label: USDC contract
Observed label: Across Protocol Spoke Pool
Observed label: Wrapped Ether (WETH)
Recognizable bridge, exchange, or protocol context suggests a more legible operational workflow rather than a standalone adverse pattern.
Offsetting Factors
Established history Wallet age: 8.7y (observed)
Recognizable exchange or protocol context
Observed label: USDC contract
Observed label: Across Protocol Spoke Pool
Observed label: Wrapped Ether (WETH)
Recognizable protocol attribution
Observed protocol: USDC contract
Observed protocol: Across Protocol Spoke Pool
Observed protocol: Wrapped Ether (WETH)
Structural Pattern Observations
Fan-out distribution (medium confidence) The observed flow pattern is consistent with fan-out distribution behavior and also carries additional review pressure from thin visibility, limited history, or sensitive exposure. This is not a misconduct finding, but it is not a routine pattern under current coverage.
Behavior Distribution
Exchange-related interactions: 0% of observed activity. DEX-related interactions: 2% of observed activity. Bridge-related interactions: 1% of observed activity. Attributed interactions: 5% of observed activity. High-confidence attributed interactions: 4% of observed activity.
Normalization Context
Observed bridge activity is being treated primarily as cross-chain operational context, not as a standalone adverse signal.
DEX and router usage further support a normal DeFi execution interpretation unless paired with sensitive exposure or suspicious concentration.
Observed Entity / Protocol Context
USDC contract Across Protocol Spoke Pool Wrapped Ether (WETH) USDT contract ENS Base Registrar
Observed Protocol Attribution
USDC contract Across Protocol Spoke Pool Wrapped Ether (WETH) USDT contract ENS Base Registrar
Confidence Statement
Overall assessment confidence is moderate (62%), reflecting partial coverage with usable but still incomplete behavioral signal.
Sensitivity notes
Improved transaction coverage could materially change activity-based interpretation and increase confidence.
Stronger counterparty attribution coverage could materially improve interpretability and sharpen the current score.
Off-chain context would be particularly valuable here, the detected structural patterns raise interpretive ambiguity that on-chain data alone cannot resolve.
For analysts
Generate a Defensible Verdict Report — engine version + timestamp baked in, exportable as PDF or copy-pasted as Markdown into a SAR narrative or case file.
Open report →
Run your own wallet through CredScore

Deterministic Ethereum wallet risk scoring with a full audit trail. Every signal has an explicit numeric weight, output is reproducible. Paste any wallet to see your own verdict.

First analysis is free, no credit card. Or see pricing.
Shared Jun 20, 2026