CredScore verdict
0x264b…97b5ethereumScore
69
0 = max risk · 100 = clean
Low riskReviewConfidence:38%
Review before proceeding
CredScore sees a 3.1-year-old wallet with at least 501 transfers. History capped by fetch limit and High inbound value concentration warrant manual review before this case is treated as routine. Observed entity context: USDC Token, transfer.
Wallet snapshot
Wallet age
3.1 years
Transfers observed
501
Last activity
today
Counterparties
252
Observed entity context
Labels
USDC Tokentransfercircle
Protocols
circleLINK token contract
Offsetting factors
Established history
Wallet age: 3.1y (observed)
Recognizable exchange or protocol context
Observed label: USDC Token · Observed label: transfer · Observed label: circle
Recognizable protocol attribution
Observed protocol: circle · Observed protocol: LINK token contract
Observed activity context
Signals worth knowing about, but not strong enough to change the low-risk verdict above.
History capped by fetch limit
Transfers observed: At least 501 · History cap: observed count may be a lower bound (cap 500)
Incomplete transfer coverage reduces confidence because observed totals may be lower bounds.
High inbound value concentration
Single source supplied 84% of inbound ETH value · Distinct inbound counterparties (all assets): 25
A large share of inbound value is concentrated in a few transfers, which can indicate a single large unexplained windfall.
Review-sensitive fan-out distribution pattern
Transfers observed: At least 501 · Unique counterparties: 252 · Top counterparty share: 22%
A review-sensitive fan-out distribution pattern was detected. The structural heuristics indicate this wallet distributes funds to multiple distinct recipients in a compressed fashion that raises review priority when combined with other signals.
Analyst briefing
Executive Risk Verdict
This 3.1-year-old address presents lower relative counterparty risk. The observable behavior is consistent with stable usage and no dominant adverse drivers were detected, though it should still be contextualized with broader exposure intelligence when available.
Decision Posture
Review before proceeding. One or more review-sensitive structural patterns were detected (Fan-out distribution), which elevates the review requirement beyond what the base risk tier alone would indicate. Human context is needed to interpret these findings correctly.
Primary Risk Drivers
History capped by fetch limit Transfers observed: At least 501 History cap: observed count may be a lower bound (cap 500) Incomplete transfer coverage reduces confidence because observed totals may be lower bounds.
High inbound value concentration
Single source supplied 84% of inbound ETH value
Distinct inbound counterparties (all assets): 25
A large share of inbound value is concentrated in a few transfers, which can indicate a single large unexplained windfall.
Review-sensitive fan-out distribution pattern
Transfers observed: At least 501
Unique counterparties: 252
Top counterparty share: 22%
A review-sensitive fan-out distribution pattern was detected. The structural heuristics indicate this wallet distributes funds to multiple distinct recipients in a compressed fashion that raises review priority when combined with other signals.
Offsetting Factors
Established history Wallet age: 3.1y (observed)
Recognizable exchange or protocol context
Observed label: USDC Token
Observed label: transfer
Observed label: circle
Recognizable protocol attribution
Observed protocol: circle
Observed protocol: LINK token contract
Structural Pattern Observations
Fan-out distribution (high confidence) The observed flow pattern is consistent with fan-out distribution behavior and also carries additional review pressure from thin visibility, limited history, or sensitive exposure. This is not a misconduct finding, but it is not a routine pattern under current coverage.
Behavior Distribution
Attributed interactions: 100% of observed activity, but only 3% resolved with high confidence, the remainder are unlabeled contract interactions, which is opacity rather than meaningful attribution coverage. High-confidence attributed interactions: 3% of observed activity.
Observed Entity / Protocol Context
USDC Token transfer circle
Observed Protocol Attribution
circle LINK token contract
Confidence Statement
Overall assessment confidence is low (38%), constrained by limited coverage, short history, or sparse behavioral signal.
Sensitivity notes
Improved transaction coverage could materially change activity-based interpretation and increase confidence.
Improved data coverage for missing core metrics would likely improve confidence and may affect the trust score.
Off-chain context would be particularly valuable here, the detected structural patterns raise interpretive ambiguity that on-chain data alone cannot resolve.
For analysts
Generate a Defensible Verdict Report — engine version + timestamp baked in, exportable as PDF or copy-pasted as Markdown into a SAR narrative or case file.
Run your own wallet through CredScore
Deterministic Ethereum wallet risk scoring with a full audit trail. Every signal has an explicit numeric weight, output is reproducible. Paste any wallet to see your own verdict.
First analysis is free, no credit card. Or see pricing.
Shared Jul 13, 2026