Wallets/0x16adc4…70b2fa
ethereum

0x16adc4f3c33dd1c60098abd45090b42df370b2fa

Analyzed by the CredScore behavioral risk engine on . Engine version 1.0.0.

Score
63/100
0 clean · 100 max risk
Tier
Medium risk
CredScore banding
Decision
Review
Recommended analyst disposition
Confidence
20%
Low — thin signal
Review before proceeding
Open Defensible Verdict Report →View investigation graphTrace money flowRelated walletsBehavioral watermark ✦Analyze another wallet
Ask about this wallet
Try
Deterministic. Every answer is a lookup on a specific field on the verdict payload — no LLM, no hallucinations. Sources shown per answer.
CredScore Copilot
LLM-assisted investigation on this verdict. BYOK — your key stays in your browser, never touches our servers.
Bring your own Anthropic (Claude) or OpenAI key. Click Configure key to add one — it's stored only in your browser and used to call the provider directly from this page. Zero CredScore-side cost, zero PII on our servers.
Summary

CredScore sees a 7-month-old wallet with 8 transfers. Funding dependency concentration and Balance unavailable warrant manual review before this case is treated as routine. Observed entity context: Polygon Bridge.

Wallet snapshot at analysis time
Transfers observed
8
Wallet age
0.5 years
200 days
Last activity
159 days ago
Unique counterparties
4
Sanctions exposure
0
Mixer-like interactions
0
Bridge-like interactions
1
Primary risk drivers (3)
Funding dependency concentration
medium
  • Source return count: 1
  • Repeated amount-band recirculation: 1
  • Funding dependency concentration: 75%
  • Multi-hop pressure: 22/100
A large share of inbound activity appears to depend on one upstream source, which increases dependence risk and can be a precursor to distribution or circular funding patterns.
Balance unavailable
medium
  • Native balance: Unknown
Missing core metrics reduce confidence and increase the chance of misclassification.
sanctioned_dust_contact
medium
  • Wallet age: 7 months
  • Transfers observed: 8
  • Native balance: Unknown
This signal materially affects trust assessment under generalized on-chain metrics.
Sanctioned counterparty interactions (1)
0x9dd7fa4b4950154f7e75bdd8a77266b99b94ec08
OFAC SDN-listed address · OFAC_SDN
OFAC SDN ETH list (maintained mirror); not present in truncated CSV
Offsetting factors considered
  • Observable activity present. Transfers observed: 8
  • Bridge usage provides cross-chain context. Bridge-related interaction share: 13%
  • Recognizable exchange or protocol context. Observed label: Polygon Bridge
Other medium risk verdicts on ethereum
0x563b37…123911
54Medium risk
0x1b1877…c6f477
47Medium risk
0xa338ae…cfa05c
59Medium risk
This verdict is a forensic snapshot as of the analysis timestamp above. Subsequent on-chain activity is not reflected until the wallet is re-analyzed. CredScore’s output is decision support based on public on-chain activity and does not constitute a final compliance determination.
Sign up to monitor this wallet →How the engine works