ethereum
0x1a222f9b072aed5e9e815849de5a11b0fe3958ab
Analyzed by the CredScore behavioral risk engine on . Engine version 1.0.0.
Score
58/100
0 clean · 100 max risk
Tier
Medium risk
CredScore banding
Decision
Review
Recommended analyst disposition
Confidence
46%
Low — thin signal
Review before proceeding
Ask about this wallet
Try
Deterministic. Every answer is a lookup on a specific field on the verdict payload — no LLM, no hallucinations. Sources shown per answer.
CredScore Copilot
LLM-assisted investigation on this verdict. BYOK — your key stays in your browser, never touches our servers.
Bring your own Anthropic (Claude) or OpenAI key. Click Configure key to add one — it's stored only in your browser and used to call the provider directly from this page. Zero CredScore-side cost, zero PII on our servers.
Summary
CredScore sees a 3-month-old wallet with at least 501 transfers. History capped by fetch limit and High inbound value concentration warrant manual review before this case is treated as routine. Observed entity context: USDC contract, USDT contract.
Wallet snapshot at analysis time
Transfers observed
501
Wallet age
0.2 years
77 days
Last activity
0 days ago
Unique counterparties
363
Sanctions exposure
0
Mixer-like interactions
0
Bridge-like interactions
0
Primary risk drivers (3)
History capped by fetch limit
medium- Transfers observed: At least 501
- History cap: observed count may be a lower bound (cap 500)
Incomplete transfer coverage reduces confidence because observed totals may be lower bounds.
High inbound value concentration
medium- Single source supplied 97% of inbound ETH value
- Distinct inbound counterparties (all assets): 15
A large share of inbound value is concentrated in a few transfers, which can indicate a single large unexplained windfall.
Review-sensitive fan-out distribution pattern
medium- Transfers observed: At least 501
- Unique counterparties: 363
- Top counterparty share: 5%
A review-sensitive fan-out distribution pattern was detected. The structural heuristics indicate this wallet distributes funds to multiple distinct recipients in a compressed fashion that raises review priority when combined with other signals.
Sanctioned counterparty interactions (5)
0x9697749a9e8d6c119d8eeb0d6268a1b99c40684c
OFAC SDN-listed address · OFAC_SDN
OFAC SDN ETH list (maintained mirror); not present in truncated CSV
0xa40cfbfc8534ffc84e20a7d8bbc3729b26a35f6f
MESRI · OFAC_SDN
Synced from OFAC SDN CSV
0x6fac4d18c912343bf86fa7049364dd4e424ab9c0
MESRI · OFAC_SDN
Synced from OFAC SDN CSV
0xeb507efa9ee692a4c774ad1de9f3cb26fc459da3
KAHZADIAN · OFAC_SDN
Synced from OFAC SDN CSV
0x1b8579cf6ab12ea6b74ac5fa41f3829a3cb61e6e
GHAL'EH-KUHI · OFAC_SDN
Synced from OFAC SDN CSV
Offsetting factors considered
- Recognizable exchange or protocol context. Observed label: USDC contract; Observed label: USDT contract; Observed label: Wrapped Ether (WETH)
- Recognizable protocol attribution. Observed protocol: Wrapped Ether (WETH); Observed protocol: USDT contract; Observed protocol: USDC contract
Other medium risk verdicts on ethereum
This verdict is a forensic snapshot as of the analysis timestamp above. Subsequent on-chain activity is not reflected until the wallet is re-analyzed. CredScore’s output is decision support based on public on-chain activity and does not constitute a final compliance determination.