ethereum
0x1b1877fba975fa4cbb14bb28f2b51c21cfc6f477
Analyzed by the CredScore behavioral risk engine on . Engine version 1.0.0.
Score
46/100
0 clean · 100 max risk
Tier
Medium risk
CredScore banding
Decision
Review
Recommended analyst disposition
Confidence
50%
Low — thin signal
Review before proceeding
Ask about this wallet
Try
Deterministic. Every answer is a lookup on a specific field on the verdict payload — no LLM, no hallucinations. Sources shown per answer.
CredScore Copilot
LLM-assisted investigation on this verdict. BYOK — your key stays in your browser, never touches our servers.
Bring your own Anthropic (Claude) or OpenAI key. Click Configure key to add one — it's stored only in your browser and used to call the provider directly from this page. Zero CredScore-side cost, zero PII on our servers.
Summary
CredScore sees a 3.6-year-old wallet with at least 501 transfers. DEX-routed pass-through pattern and History capped by fetch limit warrant manual review before this case is treated as routine. Observed entity context: USDT Token, tether.
Wallet snapshot at analysis time
Transfers observed
501
Wallet age
3.6 years
1328 days
Last activity
32 days ago
Unique counterparties
24
Sanctions exposure
0
Mixer-like interactions
0
Bridge-like interactions
0
Primary risk drivers (3)
DEX-routed pass-through pattern
high- Single inbound source supplied 63% of inbound value
- Flow directionality: heavily one-sided (balance score 0.00)
A dominant share of the wallet's inbound value came from a single source, was routed through DEX or aggregator swap activity, and was drained from the wallet rather than retained. This is the laundering fingerprint observed on documented social-engineering theft cases: a large victim transfer arrives, gets fragmented into many DEX swaps to convert and obscure the asset trail, and the wallet is emptied. It is also consistent with one-shot legitimate behavior (an ICO recipient or grant payee cashing out via DEX), so it warrants review until the funding-source provenance is established.
History capped by fetch limit
medium- Transfers observed: At least 501
- History cap: observed count may be a lower bound (cap 500)
Incomplete transfer coverage reduces confidence because observed totals may be lower bounds.
Review-sensitive hub-and-spoke structure
medium- Transfers observed: At least 501
- Unique counterparties: 24
- Top counterparty share: 89%
A review-sensitive hub-and-spoke structure was detected. The combination of broad counterparty set with high concentration and asymmetric flow pressure warrants closer structural review.
Offsetting factors considered
- Established history. Wallet age: 3.6y (observed)
- Moderately distributed counterparties. Unique counterparties observed: 24
- Recognizable exchange or protocol context. Observed label: USDT Token; Observed label: tether
Other medium risk verdicts on ethereum
This verdict is a forensic snapshot as of the analysis timestamp above. Subsequent on-chain activity is not reflected until the wallet is re-analyzed. CredScore’s output is decision support based on public on-chain activity and does not constitute a final compliance determination.