Ethereum
0x2767ae7e0c205425a7b7f7583c512513c527f482
Analyzed by the CredScore behavioral risk engine on . Engine version 1.0.0.
Score
56/100
0 clean · 100 max risk
Tier
Medium risk
CredScore banding
Decision
Review
Recommended analyst disposition
Confidence
48%
Low — thin signal
Review before proceeding
Ask about this wallet
Try
Deterministic. Every answer is a lookup on a specific field on the verdict payload — no LLM, no hallucinations. Sources shown per answer.
CredScore Copilot
LLM-assisted investigation on this verdict. BYOK — your key stays in your browser, never touches our servers.
Bring your own Anthropic (Claude) or OpenAI key. Click Configure key to add one — it's stored only in your browser and used to call the provider directly from this page. Zero CredScore-side cost, zero PII on our servers.
Summary
CredScore sees a 20-day-old wallet with at least 44 transfers. History capped by fetch limit and High inbound value concentration warrant manual review before this case is treated as routine. Observed entity context: transfer, 1inch.
Wallet snapshot at analysis time
Transfers observed
44
Wallet age
0.1 years
20 days
Last activity
9 days ago
Unique counterparties
38
Sanctions exposure
0
Mixer-like interactions
0
Bridge-like interactions
0
Primary risk drivers (3)
History capped by fetch limit
medium- Transfers observed: At least 44
- History cap: observed count may be a lower bound (cap 500)
Incomplete transfer coverage reduces confidence because observed totals may be lower bounds.
High inbound value concentration
medium- Single source supplied >99% of inbound ETH value
- Distinct inbound counterparties (all assets): 36
A large share of inbound value is concentrated in a few transfers, which can indicate a single large unexplained windfall.
Repeated amount-band recirculation
medium- Repeated amount-band recirculation: 2
- Funding dependency concentration: 10%
- Multi-hop pressure: 22/100
Repeated reuse of the same transfer size bands across a narrow routing set can indicate mechanical flow or recirculation rather than broad organic usage.
Offsetting factors considered
- Moderately distributed counterparties. Unique counterparties observed: 38
- Recognizable exchange or protocol context. Observed label: transfer; Observed label: 1inch; Observed label: 1inch Router
- Recognizable protocol attribution. Observed protocol: 1inch; Observed protocol: USDT contract
Other medium risk verdicts on Ethereum
This verdict is a forensic snapshot as of the analysis timestamp above. Subsequent on-chain activity is not reflected until the wallet is re-analyzed. CredScore’s output is decision support based on public on-chain activity and does not constitute a final compliance determination.