ethereum
0x5a7a51bfb49f190e5a6060a5bc6052ac14a3b59f
Analyzed by the CredScore behavioral risk engine on . Engine version 1.0.0.
Score
12/100
0 clean · 100 max risk
Tier
High risk
CredScore banding
Decision
Escalate
Recommended analyst disposition
Confidence
54%
Low — thin signal
Escalate for deeper review
Ask about this wallet
Try
Deterministic. Every answer is a lookup on a specific field on the verdict payload — no LLM, no hallucinations. Sources shown per answer.
CredScore Copilot
LLM-assisted investigation on this verdict. BYOK — your key stays in your browser, never touches our servers.
Bring your own Anthropic (Claude) or OpenAI key. Click Configure key to add one — it's stored only in your browser and used to call the provider directly from this page. Zero CredScore-side cost, zero PII on our servers.
Summary
CredScore sees a 5.6-year-old wallet with 68 transfers. High-confidence sanctions attribution and Sanctions-sensitive exposure context are severe enough to require escalation before any further interaction.
Wallet snapshot at analysis time
Transfers observed
68
Wallet age
5.6 years
2037 days
Last activity
180 days ago
Unique counterparties
25
Sanctions exposure
4
Mixer-like interactions
0
Bridge-like interactions
0
Primary risk drivers (3)
High-confidence sanctions attribution
high- This wallet itself is on a sanctions watchlist (per the curated registry or OFAC SDN sync).
Sanctions-sensitive attribution materially increases review urgency because legal and compliance context becomes critical.
Sanctions-sensitive exposure context
high- Sanctioned counterparty interactions observed: 4
- Observed labels: Ethereum Foundation
Sanctions-sensitive attribution materially increases review urgency because legal and compliance context becomes critical.
DEX-routed pass-through pattern
high- Single inbound source supplied 77% of inbound value
- DEX + aggregator routing share: 24% of activity
- Flow directionality: heavily one-sided (balance score 0.00)
A dominant share of the wallet's inbound value came from a single source, was routed through DEX or aggregator swap activity, and was drained from the wallet rather than retained. This is the laundering fingerprint observed on documented social-engineering theft cases: a large victim transfer arrives, gets fragmented into many DEX swaps to convert and obscure the asset trail, and the wallet is emptied. It is also consistent with one-shot legitimate behavior (an ICO recipient or grant payee cashing out via DEX), so it warrants review until the funding-source provenance is established.
Sanctioned counterparty interactions (5)
0x5a7a51bfb49f190e5a6060a5bc6052ac14a3b59f
SEMENOV · OFAC_SDN
Synced from OFAC SDN CSV
0x5f48c2a71b2cc96e3f0ccae4e39318ff0dc375b2
SEMENOV · OFAC_SDN
Synced from OFAC SDN CSV
0xed6e0a7e4ac94d976eebfb82ccf777a3c6bad921
SEMENOV · OFAC_SDN
Synced from OFAC SDN CSV
0x6be0ae71e6c41f2f9d0d1a3b8d0f75e6f6a0b46e
SEMENOV · OFAC_SDN
Synced from OFAC SDN CSV
0x797d7ae72ebddcdea2a346c1834e04d1f8df102b
SEMENOV · OFAC_SDN
Synced from OFAC SDN CSV
Offsetting factors considered
- Established history. Wallet age: 5.6y (observed)
- Observable activity present. Transfers observed: 68
- Moderately distributed counterparties. Unique counterparties observed: 25
Other high risk verdicts on ethereum
This verdict is a forensic snapshot as of the analysis timestamp above. Subsequent on-chain activity is not reflected until the wallet is re-analyzed. CredScore’s output is decision support based on public on-chain activity and does not constitute a final compliance determination.