ethereum
0x609fd4b9c89fe9927beba355334acb3511fdcb2b
Analyzed by the CredScore behavioral risk engine on . Engine version 1.0.0.
Score
12/100
0 clean · 100 max risk
Tier
High risk
CredScore banding
Decision
Escalate
Recommended analyst disposition
Confidence
52%
Low — thin signal
Escalate for deeper review
Ask about this wallet
Try
Deterministic. Every answer is a lookup on a specific field on the verdict payload — no LLM, no hallucinations. Sources shown per answer.
CredScore Copilot
LLM-assisted investigation on this verdict. BYOK — your key stays in your browser, never touches our servers.
Bring your own Anthropic (Claude) or OpenAI key. Click Configure key to add one — it's stored only in your browser and used to call the provider directly from this page. Zero CredScore-side cost, zero PII on our servers.
Summary
CredScore sees a 2.0-year-old wallet with 39 transfers. Sanctions-sensitive exposure context and High-confidence sanctions attribution are severe enough to require escalation before any further interaction.
Wallet snapshot at analysis time
Transfers observed
39
Wallet age
2.0 years
732 days
Last activity
575 days ago
Unique counterparties
17
Sanctions exposure
1
Mixer-like interactions
0
Bridge-like interactions
0
Primary risk drivers (3)
Sanctions-sensitive exposure context
high- Sanctioned counterparty interactions observed: 1
- Observed labels: Uniswap Universal Router, transfer, approve
Sanctions-sensitive attribution materially increases review urgency because legal and compliance context becomes critical.
High-confidence sanctions attribution
high- Sanctioned counterparty interactions observed: 1
Sanctions-sensitive attribution materially increases review urgency because legal and compliance context becomes critical.
DEX-routed pass-through pattern
high- Single inbound source supplied 61% of inbound value
- DEX + aggregator routing share: 62% of activity
- Flow directionality: heavily one-sided (balance score 0.00)
A dominant share of the wallet's inbound value came from a single source, was routed through DEX or aggregator swap activity, and was drained from the wallet rather than retained. This is the laundering fingerprint observed on documented social-engineering theft cases: a large victim transfer arrives, gets fragmented into many DEX swaps to convert and obscure the asset trail, and the wallet is emptied. It is also consistent with one-shot legitimate behavior (an ICO recipient or grant payee cashing out via DEX), so it warrants review until the funding-source provenance is established.
Sanctioned counterparty interactions (1)
0xb637f84b66876ebf609c2a4208905f9ddac9d075
YUN · OFAC_SDN
Synced from OFAC SDN CSV
Offsetting factors considered
- Established history. Wallet age: 2.0y (observed)
- Observable activity present. Transfers observed: 39
- Moderately distributed counterparties. Unique counterparties observed: 17
Other high risk verdicts on ethereum
This verdict is a forensic snapshot as of the analysis timestamp above. Subsequent on-chain activity is not reflected until the wallet is re-analyzed. CredScore’s output is decision support based on public on-chain activity and does not constitute a final compliance determination.