ethereum
0x698e5075777db9bff209c9573abfd8df4cf4da27
Analyzed by the CredScore behavioral risk engine on . Engine version 1.0.0.
Score
42/100
0 clean · 100 max risk
Tier
Medium risk
CredScore banding
Decision
Review
Recommended analyst disposition
Confidence
36%
Low — thin signal
Review before proceeding
Ask about this wallet
Try
Deterministic. Every answer is a lookup on a specific field on the verdict payload — no LLM, no hallucinations. Sources shown per answer.
CredScore Copilot
LLM-assisted investigation on this verdict. BYOK — your key stays in your browser, never touches our servers.
Bring your own Anthropic (Claude) or OpenAI key. Click Configure key to add one — it's stored only in your browser and used to call the provider directly from this page. Zero CredScore-side cost, zero PII on our servers.
Summary
CredScore sees a 8-day-old wallet with at least 112 transfers. High activity with limited history and History capped by fetch limit warrant manual review before this case is treated as routine. Observed entity context: Metamask Swaps, USDT Token.
Wallet snapshot at analysis time
Transfers observed
112
Wallet age
0.0 years
8 days
Last activity
4 days ago
Unique counterparties
35
Sanctions exposure
0
Mixer-like interactions
0
Bridge-like interactions
0
Primary risk drivers (3)
High activity with limited history
medium- Transfers observed: At least 112
- History cap: observed count may be a lower bound (cap 500)
High activity in a newly observed wallet can indicate burst behavior that deserves closer review, especially when there is not yet enough time depth to normalize the pattern.
History capped by fetch limit
medium- Transfers observed: At least 112
- History cap: observed count may be a lower bound (cap 500)
Incomplete transfer coverage reduces confidence because observed totals may be lower bounds.
Repeated amount-band recirculation
medium- Circular loop count: 1
- Source return count: 1
- Repeated amount-band recirculation: 2
- Funding dependency concentration: 43%
Repeated reuse of the same transfer size bands across a narrow routing set can indicate mechanical flow or recirculation rather than broad organic usage.
Offsetting factors considered
- Moderately distributed counterparties. Unique counterparties observed: 35
- Recognizable exchange or protocol context. Observed label: Metamask Swaps; Observed label: USDT Token; Observed label: 1inch
- Recognizable protocol attribution. Observed protocol: Wrapped Ether (WETH); Observed protocol: Uniswap V2 Router; Observed protocol: metamask
Other medium risk verdicts on ethereum
This verdict is a forensic snapshot as of the analysis timestamp above. Subsequent on-chain activity is not reflected until the wallet is re-analyzed. CredScore’s output is decision support based on public on-chain activity and does not constitute a final compliance determination.