ethereum
Behavioral watermarkMOONSHOT · v10x6a1544f72a2a275715e8d5924e6d8a017f0e41ed
The wallet’s 20-dimensional behavioral fingerprint, and the wallets in CredScore’s corpus with the most similar operational shape. High similarity across wallets with different addresses, chains, or attribution suggests the same actor, service, or laundering ring — even when no labels overlap.
Fingerprint for this wallet · 100% coverage
Wallet age
95
Transfer volume
73
Activity rate
1
Counterparty breadth
63
Counterparty concentration
38
Counterparty entropy
96
Inbound share
41
Rapid-inflow burstiness
5
Rapid-outflow burstiness
21
Mixer exposure
0
Bridge exposure
0
Exchange exposure
0
DEX exposure
0
Aggregator exposure
0
Protocol exposure
59
Attribution coverage
100
Zero-value transfer ratio
41
Recency (dormancy)
5
Self-transfer ratio
0
Top inbound source share
100
Closest matches in the CredScore corpus (10)
99%
similarity
Ethereumhighscore 12
0xd5ed34…1ed510
Most alike: Mixer exposure, DEX exposure, Aggregator exposure
Diverges on: Protocol exposure, Inbound share, Counterparty entropy
Diverges on: Protocol exposure, Inbound share, Counterparty entropy
99%
similarity
ethereumlowscore 86
0xf88d68…50a69b
Most alike: Mixer exposure, Aggregator exposure, Attribution coverage
Diverges on: Counterparty concentration, Zero-value transfer ratio, Protocol exposure
Diverges on: Counterparty concentration, Zero-value transfer ratio, Protocol exposure
99%
similarity
ethereummediumscore 54
0x0e37df…45c8ec
Most alike: Mixer exposure, DEX exposure, Aggregator exposure
Diverges on: Counterparty entropy, Transfer volume, Rapid-outflow burstiness
Diverges on: Counterparty entropy, Transfer volume, Rapid-outflow burstiness
99%
similarity
Ethereumhighscore 0
0xdcbeff…643193
Most alike: Transfer volume, Attribution coverage, Recency (dormancy)
Diverges on: Protocol exposure, Counterparty concentration, Wallet age
Diverges on: Protocol exposure, Counterparty concentration, Wallet age
98%
similarity
ethereumlowscore 80
0x6871ea…2dc5a0
Most alike: Transfer volume, Mixer exposure, Aggregator exposure
Diverges on: Counterparty concentration, Protocol exposure, Counterparty breadth
Diverges on: Counterparty concentration, Protocol exposure, Counterparty breadth
98%
similarity
ethereumlowscore 75
0xa205fd…b3e825
Most alike: Transfer volume, Mixer exposure, Aggregator exposure
Diverges on: Protocol exposure, Counterparty concentration, Activity rate
Diverges on: Protocol exposure, Counterparty concentration, Activity rate
98%
similarity
ethereumlowscore 69
0xbb792d…0097a2
Most alike: Mixer exposure, Attribution coverage, Self-transfer ratio
Diverges on: Transfer volume, Wallet age, Recency (dormancy)
Diverges on: Transfer volume, Wallet age, Recency (dormancy)
98%
similarity
ethereumhighscore 12
0x18b009…e89634
Most alike: Transfer volume, Mixer exposure, DEX exposure
Diverges on: Recency (dormancy), Rapid-outflow burstiness, Top inbound source share
Diverges on: Recency (dormancy), Rapid-outflow burstiness, Top inbound source share
98%
similarity
Ethereumhighscore 12
0x9be599…a15573
Most alike: Mixer exposure, Attribution coverage, Self-transfer ratio
Diverges on: Counterparty concentration, Zero-value transfer ratio, Transfer volume
Diverges on: Counterparty concentration, Zero-value transfer ratio, Transfer volume
98%
similarity
ethereumlowscore 75
0x446b2a…c02cd0
Most alike: Transfer volume, Mixer exposure, Exchange exposure
Diverges on: Protocol exposure, Counterparty concentration, Zero-value transfer ratio
Diverges on: Protocol exposure, Counterparty concentration, Zero-value transfer ratio
How the fingerprint works. Twenty behavioral dimensions (wallet age, transfer volume, activity rate, counterparty breadth, timing patterns, protocol mix, dormancy, self-ratio, etc.) are normalized to 0-1 and stored as a vector per wallet. Similarity is cosine distance in that space. Dimensions are pattern metrics only — score, tier, and sanctions counts are excluded to keep the fingerprint from becoming circular. Read the technical primitive at /whitepaper.