Ethereum
0x837f6bf7c30607cdfb81c02f102ce0ea9eb2e90c
Analyzed by the CredScore behavioral risk engine on . Engine version 1.0.0.
Score
45/100
0 clean · 100 max risk
Tier
Medium risk
CredScore banding
Decision
Review
Recommended analyst disposition
Confidence
76%
Moderate — directional
Review before proceeding
Ask about this wallet
Try
Deterministic. Every answer is a lookup on a specific field on the verdict payload — no LLM, no hallucinations. Sources shown per answer.
CredScore Copilot
LLM-assisted investigation on this verdict. BYOK — your key stays in your browser, never touches our servers.
Bring your own Anthropic (Claude) or OpenAI key. Click Configure key to add one — it's stored only in your browser and used to call the provider directly from this page. Zero CredScore-side cost, zero PII on our servers.
Summary
CredScore sees a 5.8-year-old wallet with at least 218 transfers. DEX-routed pass-through pattern and History capped by fetch limit warrant manual review before this case is treated as routine. Observed entity context: Uniswap Universal Router, USDT Token.
Wallet snapshot at analysis time
Transfers observed
218
Wallet age
5.8 years
2128 days
Last activity
108 days ago
Unique counterparties
59
Sanctions exposure
0
Mixer-like interactions
0
Bridge-like interactions
0
Primary risk drivers (3)
DEX-routed pass-through pattern
high- Single inbound source supplied 79% of inbound value
- DEX + aggregator routing share: 21% of activity
- Flow directionality: heavily one-sided (balance score 0.00)
A dominant share of the wallet's inbound value came from a single source, was routed through DEX or aggregator swap activity, and was drained from the wallet rather than retained. This is the laundering fingerprint observed on documented social-engineering theft cases: a large victim transfer arrives, gets fragmented into many DEX swaps to convert and obscure the asset trail, and the wallet is emptied. It is also consistent with one-shot legitimate behavior (an ICO recipient or grant payee cashing out via DEX), so it warrants review until the funding-source provenance is established.
History capped by fetch limit
medium- Transfers observed: At least 218
- History cap: observed count may be a lower bound (cap 500)
Incomplete transfer coverage reduces confidence because observed totals may be lower bounds.
Source return flow detected
medium- Circular loop count: 1
- Source return count: 7
- Linked recirculating counterparties: 1
- Bidirectional cluster count: 1
Observed sources later reappear as return destinations, which reduces legibility and suggests recirculating flow rather than clean one-direction settlement.
Offsetting factors considered
- Established history. Wallet age: 5.8y (observed)
- Moderately distributed counterparties. Unique counterparties observed: 59
- Material attribution coverage. Attributed interaction share: 100% (12% high-confidence)
Other medium risk verdicts on Ethereum
This verdict is a forensic snapshot as of the analysis timestamp above. Subsequent on-chain activity is not reflected until the wallet is re-analyzed. CredScore’s output is decision support based on public on-chain activity and does not constitute a final compliance determination.