Wallets/0x8ffec3…cd8df5
ethereum

0x8ffec32cbaa55d5f729a8007b99a36f1a9cd8df5

Analyzed by the CredScore behavioral risk engine on . Engine version 1.0.0.

Score
19/100
0 clean · 100 max risk
Tier
High risk
CredScore banding
Decision
Escalate
Recommended analyst disposition
Confidence
40%
Low — thin signal
Escalate for deeper review
Open Defensible Verdict Report →View investigation graphTrace money flowRelated walletsBehavioral watermark ✦Analyze another wallet
Ask about this wallet
Try
Deterministic. Every answer is a lookup on a specific field on the verdict payload — no LLM, no hallucinations. Sources shown per answer.
CredScore Copilot
LLM-assisted investigation on this verdict. BYOK — your key stays in your browser, never touches our servers.
Bring your own Anthropic (Claude) or OpenAI key. Click Configure key to add one — it's stored only in your browser and used to call the provider directly from this page. Zero CredScore-side cost, zero PII on our servers.
Summary

CredScore sees a 1.5-year-old wallet with 22 transfers. Sanctions-sensitive exposure context and Review-sensitive peel-chain-like routing are severe enough to require escalation before any further interaction.

Wallet snapshot at analysis time
Transfers observed
22
Wallet age
1.5 years
550 days
Last activity
344 days ago
Unique counterparties
2
Sanctions exposure
1
Mixer-like interactions
0
Bridge-like interactions
0
Primary risk drivers (3)
Sanctions-sensitive exposure context
high
  • Sanctioned counterparty interactions observed: 1
Sanctions-sensitive attribution materially increases review urgency because legal and compliance context becomes critical.
Review-sensitive peel-chain-like routing
high
  • Transfers observed: 22
  • Unique counterparties: 2
  • Top counterparty share: 95%
A review-sensitive peel-chain-like routing pattern was detected. The observed combination of self-transfers, narrow counterparties, and repetitive flow is consistent with layered routing behavior that warrants closer inspection.
Repeated amount-band recirculation
medium
  • Repeated amount-band recirculation: 3
  • Funding dependency concentration: 95%
  • Multi-hop pressure: 22/100
Repeated reuse of the same transfer size bands across a narrow routing set can indicate mechanical flow or recirculation rather than broad organic usage.
Sanctioned counterparty interactions (1)
0x532b77b33a040587e9fd1800088225f99b8b0e8a
ALIVAND · OFAC_SDN
Synced from OFAC SDN CSV
Offsetting factors considered
  • Established history. Wallet age: 1.5y (observed)
  • Observable activity present. Transfers observed: 22
Other high risk verdicts on ethereum
0x432dff…c81f06
21High risk
0x2bbf18…428887
21High risk
0xf424b7…a80679
16High risk
This verdict is a forensic snapshot as of the analysis timestamp above. Subsequent on-chain activity is not reflected until the wallet is re-analyzed. CredScore’s output is decision support based on public on-chain activity and does not constitute a final compliance determination.
Sign up to monitor this wallet →How the engine works