Wallets/0xbb1f16…8ff446
ethereum

0xbb1f16e27b235e6e2ff7d86319cb02e91c8ff446

Analyzed by the CredScore behavioral risk engine on . Engine version 1.0.0.

Score
56/100
0 clean · 100 max risk
Tier
Medium risk
CredScore banding
Decision
Review
Recommended analyst disposition
Confidence
66%
Moderate — directional
Review before proceeding
Open Defensible Verdict Report →View investigation graphTrace money flowRelated walletsBehavioral watermark ✦Analyze another wallet
Ask about this wallet
Try
Deterministic. Every answer is a lookup on a specific field on the verdict payload — no LLM, no hallucinations. Sources shown per answer.
CredScore Copilot
LLM-assisted investigation on this verdict. BYOK — your key stays in your browser, never touches our servers.
Bring your own Anthropic (Claude) or OpenAI key. Click Configure key to add one — it's stored only in your browser and used to call the provider directly from this page. Zero CredScore-side cost, zero PII on our servers.
Summary

CredScore sees a 4.2-year-old wallet with 158 transfers. Source return flow detected and Funding dependency concentration warrant manual review before this case is treated as routine. Observed entity context: USDC Token, USDT Token.

Wallet snapshot at analysis time
Transfers observed
158
Wallet age
4.2 years
1526 days
Last activity
1021 days ago
Unique counterparties
23
Sanctions exposure
0
Mixer-like interactions
0
Bridge-like interactions
0
Primary risk drivers (3)
Source return flow detected
medium
  • Source return count: 2
  • Repeated amount-band recirculation: 6
  • Funding dependency concentration: 69%
  • Multi-hop pressure: 6/100
Observed sources later reappear as return destinations, which reduces legibility and suggests recirculating flow rather than clean one-direction settlement.
Funding dependency concentration
medium
  • Source return count: 2
  • Repeated amount-band recirculation: 6
  • Funding dependency concentration: 69%
  • Multi-hop pressure: 6/100
A large share of inbound activity appears to depend on one upstream source, which increases dependence risk and can be a precursor to distribution or circular funding patterns.
Repeated amount-band recirculation
medium
  • Source return count: 2
  • Repeated amount-band recirculation: 6
  • Funding dependency concentration: 69%
  • Multi-hop pressure: 6/100
Repeated reuse of the same transfer size bands across a narrow routing set can indicate mechanical flow or recirculation rather than broad organic usage.
Offsetting factors considered
  • Established history. Wallet age: 4.2y (observed)
  • Observable activity present. Transfers observed: 158
  • Moderately distributed counterparties. Unique counterparties observed: 23
Other medium risk verdicts on ethereum
0x2eee95…16716f
65Medium risk
0x096498…e05080
65Medium risk
0x8691e3…471459
59Medium risk
This verdict is a forensic snapshot as of the analysis timestamp above. Subsequent on-chain activity is not reflected until the wallet is re-analyzed. CredScore’s output is decision support based on public on-chain activity and does not constitute a final compliance determination.
Sign up to monitor this wallet →How the engine works