Ethereum
0xe6ec0de23b6db6604113cb79db609d5da461c961
Analyzed by the CredScore behavioral risk engine on . Engine version 1.0.0.
Score
47/100
0 clean · 100 max risk
Tier
Medium risk
CredScore banding
Decision
Review
Recommended analyst disposition
Confidence
86%
High — strong signal
Review before proceeding
Ask about this wallet
Try
Deterministic. Every answer is a lookup on a specific field on the verdict payload — no LLM, no hallucinations. Sources shown per answer.
CredScore Copilot
LLM-assisted investigation on this verdict. BYOK — your key stays in your browser, never touches our servers.
Bring your own Anthropic (Claude) or OpenAI key. Click Configure key to add one — it's stored only in your browser and used to call the provider directly from this page. Zero CredScore-side cost, zero PII on our servers.
Summary
CredScore sees a 5.3-year-old wallet with 309 transfers. DEX-routed pass-through pattern and Source return flow detected warrant manual review before this case is treated as routine. Observed entity context: USDT Token, tether.
Wallet snapshot at analysis time
Transfers observed
309
Wallet age
5.3 years
1929 days
Last activity
485 days ago
Unique counterparties
103
Sanctions exposure
0
Mixer-like interactions
0
Bridge-like interactions
0
Primary risk drivers (3)
DEX-routed pass-through pattern
high- Single inbound source supplied 57% of inbound value
- DEX + aggregator routing share: 28% of activity
- Flow directionality: heavily one-sided (balance score 0.00)
A dominant share of the wallet's inbound value came from a single source, was routed through DEX or aggregator swap activity, and was drained from the wallet rather than retained. This is the laundering fingerprint observed on documented social-engineering theft cases: a large victim transfer arrives, gets fragmented into many DEX swaps to convert and obscure the asset trail, and the wallet is emptied. It is also consistent with one-shot legitimate behavior (an ICO recipient or grant payee cashing out via DEX), so it warrants review until the funding-source provenance is established.
Source return flow detected
medium- Circular loop count: 1
- Source return count: 2
- Linked recirculating counterparties: 1
- Rapid round-trip count: 1
Observed sources later reappear as return destinations, which reduces legibility and suggests recirculating flow rather than clean one-direction settlement.
Review-sensitive fan-out distribution pattern
medium- Transfers observed: 309
- Unique counterparties: 103
- Top counterparty share: 41%
A review-sensitive fan-out distribution pattern was detected. The structural heuristics indicate this wallet distributes funds to multiple distinct recipients in a compressed fashion that raises review priority when combined with other signals.
Sanctioned counterparty interactions (1)
0x098b716b8aaf21512996dc57eb0615e2383e2f96
Lazarus Group (DPRK) · OFAC_SDN
Axie Infinity Ronin Bridge hack proceeds
Offsetting factors considered
- Established history. Wallet age: 5.3y (observed)
- Observable activity present. Transfers observed: 309
- Material protocol interaction context. DEX-related interaction share: 27%
Other medium risk verdicts on Ethereum
This verdict is a forensic snapshot as of the analysis timestamp above. Subsequent on-chain activity is not reflected until the wallet is re-analyzed. CredScore’s output is decision support based on public on-chain activity and does not constitute a final compliance determination.