Ethereum
0xe6ec0de23b6db6604113cb79db609d5da461c961
Analyzed by the CredScore behavioral risk engine on . Engine version 1.0.0.
Score
11/100
0 clean · 100 max risk
Tier
High risk
CredScore banding
Decision
Escalate
Recommended analyst disposition
Confidence
86%
High — strong signal
Escalate for deeper review
Ask about this wallet
Try
Deterministic. Every answer is a lookup on a specific field on the verdict payload — no LLM, no hallucinations. Sources shown per answer.
CredScore Copilot
LLM-assisted investigation on this verdict. BYOK — your key stays in your browser, never touches our servers.
Bring your own Anthropic (Claude) or OpenAI key. Click Configure key to add one — it's stored only in your browser and used to call the provider directly from this page. Zero CredScore-side cost, zero PII on our servers.
Summary
CredScore sees a 5.2-year-old wallet with 309 transfers. Sanctions-sensitive exposure context and High-confidence sanctions attribution are severe enough to require escalation before any further interaction.
Wallet snapshot at analysis time
Transfers observed
309
Wallet age
5.2 years
1886 days
Last activity
442 days ago
Unique counterparties
103
Sanctions exposure
1
Mixer-like interactions
0
Bridge-like interactions
0
Primary risk drivers (3)
Sanctions-sensitive exposure context
high- Sanctioned counterparty interactions observed: 1
- Observed labels: USDT Token, tether, uniswap
Sanctions-sensitive attribution materially increases review urgency because legal and compliance context becomes critical.
High-confidence sanctions attribution
high- Sanctioned counterparty interactions observed: 1
Sanctions-sensitive attribution materially increases review urgency because legal and compliance context becomes critical.
DEX-routed pass-through pattern
high- Single inbound source supplied 57% of inbound value
- DEX + aggregator routing share: 28% of activity
- Flow directionality: heavily one-sided (balance score 0.00)
A dominant share of the wallet's inbound value came from a single source, was routed through DEX or aggregator swap activity, and was drained from the wallet rather than retained. This is the laundering fingerprint observed on documented social-engineering theft cases: a large victim transfer arrives, gets fragmented into many DEX swaps to convert and obscure the asset trail, and the wallet is emptied. It is also consistent with one-shot legitimate behavior (an ICO recipient or grant payee cashing out via DEX), so it warrants review until the funding-source provenance is established.
Sanctioned counterparty interactions (1)
0x098b716b8aaf21512996dc57eb0615e2383e2f96
Lazarus Group (DPRK) · OFAC_SDN
Axie Infinity Ronin Bridge hack proceeds
Offsetting factors considered
- Established history. Wallet age: 5.2y (observed)
- Observable activity present. Transfers observed: 309
- Material protocol interaction context. DEX-related interaction share: 27%
Other high risk verdicts on Ethereum
This verdict is a forensic snapshot as of the analysis timestamp above. Subsequent on-chain activity is not reflected until the wallet is re-analyzed. CredScore’s output is decision support based on public on-chain activity and does not constitute a final compliance determination.