Ethereum
ZachXBT-Named Pig-Butchering Wallet0xea9fccb3ea820f080f38e9c49fc1a201066010c7
Analyzed by the CredScore behavioral risk engine on . Engine version 1.0.0.
Score
55/100
0 clean · 100 max risk
Tier
Medium risk
CredScore banding
Decision
Review
Recommended analyst disposition
Confidence
84%
High — strong signal
Review before proceeding
Ask about this wallet
Try
Deterministic. Every answer is a lookup on a specific field on the verdict payload — no LLM, no hallucinations. Sources shown per answer.
CredScore Copilot
LLM-assisted investigation on this verdict. BYOK — your key stays in your browser, never touches our servers.
Bring your own Anthropic (Claude) or OpenAI key. Click Configure key to add one — it's stored only in your browser and used to call the provider directly from this page. Zero CredScore-side cost, zero PII on our servers.
Score trajectory (2 analyses)
55 → 55
Flat
Deduped by day. Y axis inverted so top = clean (100), bottom = maximum risk (0). Each dot is a re-analysis event.
Summary
CredScore sees a 5.0-year-old wallet with 182 transfers. DEX-routed pass-through pattern and Rapid outflow pattern warrant manual review before this case is treated as routine. Observed entity context: Metamask Swaps, Uniswap V3 Router.
Wallet snapshot at analysis time
Transfers observed
182
Wallet age
5.0 years
1809 days
Last activity
30 days ago
Unique counterparties
84
Sanctions exposure
0
Mixer-like interactions
0
Bridge-like interactions
0
Primary risk drivers (3)
DEX-routed pass-through pattern
high- Single inbound source supplied 75% of inbound value
- DEX + aggregator routing share: 53% of activity
- Flow directionality: heavily one-sided (balance score 0.01)
A dominant share of the wallet's inbound value came from a single source, was routed through DEX or aggregator swap activity, and was drained from the wallet rather than retained. This is the laundering fingerprint observed on documented social-engineering theft cases: a large victim transfer arrives, gets fragmented into many DEX swaps to convert and obscure the asset trail, and the wallet is emptied. It is also consistent with one-shot legitimate behavior (an ICO recipient or grant payee cashing out via DEX), so it warrants review until the funding-source provenance is established.
Rapid outflow pattern
medium- Rapid outbound events observed: 90
Rapid outflow behavior can indicate routing, distribution, or non-routine operational flow that deserves review.
Dense contract interaction pattern
medium- Unique contracts observed: 92
- Contract interaction density: 0.51
- Observed labels: Metamask Swaps, Uniswap V3 Router, WETH Token
Heavy interaction with many contracts raises complexity and can increase behavioral uncertainty, although this may be normal for protocol-native wallets.
Offsetting factors considered
- Established history. Wallet age: 5.0y (observed)
- Observable activity present. Transfers observed: 182
- Moderately distributed counterparties. Unique counterparties observed: 84
Other medium risk verdicts on Ethereum
This verdict is a forensic snapshot as of the analysis timestamp above. Subsequent on-chain activity is not reflected until the wallet is re-analyzed. CredScore’s output is decision support based on public on-chain activity and does not constitute a final compliance determination.