ethereum
0xf2f400c138f9fb900576263af0bc7fcde2b1b8a8
Analyzed by the CredScore behavioral risk engine on . Engine version 1.0.0.
Score
0/100
0 clean · 100 max risk
Tier
High risk
CredScore banding
Decision
Escalate
Recommended analyst disposition
Confidence
58%
Moderate — directional
Escalate for deeper review
Ask about this wallet
Try
Deterministic. Every answer is a lookup on a specific field on the verdict payload — no LLM, no hallucinations. Sources shown per answer.
CredScore Copilot
LLM-assisted investigation on this verdict. BYOK — your key stays in your browser, never touches our servers.
Bring your own Anthropic (Claude) or OpenAI key. Click Configure key to add one — it's stored only in your browser and used to call the provider directly from this page. Zero CredScore-side cost, zero PII on our servers.
Summary
CredScore sees a 4.0-year-old wallet with at least 242 transfers. Circular funding pattern and DEX-routed pass-through pattern are severe enough to require escalation before any further interaction.
Wallet snapshot at analysis time
Transfers observed
242
Wallet age
4.0 years
1469 days
Last activity
38 days ago
Unique counterparties
63
Sanctions exposure
0
Mixer-like interactions
0
Bridge-like interactions
2
Primary risk drivers (3)
Circular funding pattern
high- Circular loop count: 7
- Source return count: 8
- Linked recirculating counterparties: 3
- Rapid round-trip count: 5
Funds appear to move out and then return through a narrow set of counterparties within bounded windows. This can be consistent with circular funding, staged routing, or internal treasury cycling and should be reviewed directly.
DEX-routed pass-through pattern
high- Single inbound source supplied 99% of inbound value
- DEX + aggregator routing share: 29% of activity
- Flow directionality: heavily one-sided (balance score 0.00)
A dominant share of the wallet's inbound value came from a single source, was routed through DEX or aggregator swap activity, and was drained from the wallet rather than retained. This is the laundering fingerprint observed on documented social-engineering theft cases: a large victim transfer arrives, gets fragmented into many DEX swaps to convert and obscure the asset trail, and the wallet is emptied. It is also consistent with one-shot legitimate behavior (an ICO recipient or grant payee cashing out via DEX), so it warrants review until the funding-source provenance is established.
History capped by fetch limit
medium- Transfers observed: At least 242
- History cap: observed count may be a lower bound (cap 500)
Incomplete transfer coverage reduces confidence because observed totals may be lower bounds.
Offsetting factors considered
- Established history. Wallet age: 4.0y (observed)
- Moderately distributed counterparties. Unique counterparties observed: 63
- Material protocol interaction context. DEX-related interaction share: 29%
Other high risk verdicts on ethereum
This verdict is a forensic snapshot as of the analysis timestamp above. Subsequent on-chain activity is not reflected until the wallet is re-analyzed. CredScore’s output is decision support based on public on-chain activity and does not constitute a final compliance determination.