Wallets/0xfabfce…ae50b9
ethereum

0xfabfce96bf0ff4a45c2f0068657e7efd23ae50b9

Analyzed by the CredScore behavioral risk engine on . Engine version 1.0.0.

Score
62/100
0 clean · 100 max risk
Tier
Medium risk
CredScore banding
Decision
Review
Recommended analyst disposition
Confidence
50%
Low — thin signal
Review before proceeding
Open Defensible Verdict Report →View investigation graphTrace money flowRelated walletsBehavioral watermark ✦Analyze another wallet
Ask about this wallet
Try
Deterministic. Every answer is a lookup on a specific field on the verdict payload — no LLM, no hallucinations. Sources shown per answer.
CredScore Copilot
LLM-assisted investigation on this verdict. BYOK — your key stays in your browser, never touches our servers.
Bring your own Anthropic (Claude) or OpenAI key. Click Configure key to add one — it's stored only in your browser and used to call the provider directly from this page. Zero CredScore-side cost, zero PII on our servers.
Summary

CredScore sees a 1.4-year-old wallet with at least 501 transfers. History capped by fetch limit and Repeated amount-band recirculation warrant manual review before this case is treated as routine. Observed entity context: transfer, tether.

Wallet snapshot at analysis time
Transfers observed
501
Wallet age
1.4 years
513 days
Last activity
444 days ago
Unique counterparties
16
Sanctions exposure
0
Mixer-like interactions
0
Bridge-like interactions
0
Primary risk drivers (3)
History capped by fetch limit
medium
  • Transfers observed: At least 501
  • History cap: observed count may be a lower bound (cap 500)
Incomplete transfer coverage reduces confidence because observed totals may be lower bounds.
Repeated amount-band recirculation
medium
  • Source return count: 1
  • Repeated amount-band recirculation: 5
  • Funding dependency concentration: 40%
  • Multi-hop pressure: 22/100
Repeated reuse of the same transfer size bands across a narrow routing set can indicate mechanical flow or recirculation rather than broad organic usage.
Review-sensitive fan-out distribution pattern
medium
  • Transfers observed: At least 501
  • Unique counterparties: 16
  • Top counterparty share: 41%
A review-sensitive fan-out distribution pattern was detected. The structural heuristics indicate this wallet distributes funds to multiple distinct recipients in a compressed fashion that raises review priority when combined with other signals.
Offsetting factors considered
  • Established history. Wallet age: 1.4y (observed)
  • Moderately distributed counterparties. Unique counterparties observed: 16
  • Recognizable exchange or protocol context. Observed label: transfer; Observed label: tether; Observed label: USDT Token
Other medium risk verdicts on ethereum
0x563b37…123911
54Medium risk
0xaaf08e…586b58
56Medium risk
0xc134ca…687f48
53Medium risk
This verdict is a forensic snapshot as of the analysis timestamp above. Subsequent on-chain activity is not reflected until the wallet is re-analyzed. CredScore’s output is decision support based on public on-chain activity and does not constitute a final compliance determination.
Sign up to monitor this wallet →How the engine works