CredScore Defensible Verdict Report
Verdict on 0x04db…bacf ethereum
0x04dba1194ee10112fe6c3207c0687def0e78bacf
Verdict
Score
12/100
0 = maximum risk · 100 = clean
Tier
High
Decision posture
Escalate
Confidence
54%
Low — thin signal, verify with your other tools
Escalate for deeper review
Executive summary
CredScore sees a 7.1-year-old wallet with 73 transfers. High-confidence sanctions attribution and Sanctions-sensitive exposure context are severe enough to require escalation before any further interaction.
Wallet snapshot at analysis time
Transfers observed: 73
Wallet age: 7.1 years (2606 days)
Last activity: 404 days ago
Unique counterparties: 62
Sanctions exposure count: 4
Mixer-like interactions: 0
Bridge-like interactions: 0
Primary risk drivers
- High-confidence sanctions attributionhigh
- This wallet itself is on a sanctions watchlist (per the curated registry or OFAC SDN sync).
Sanctions-sensitive attribution materially increases review urgency because legal and compliance context becomes critical.
- Sanctions-sensitive exposure contexthigh
- Sanctioned counterparty interactions observed: 4
Sanctions-sensitive attribution materially increases review urgency because legal and compliance context becomes critical.
- Source return flow detectedmedium
- Source return count: 2
- Repeated amount-band recirculation: 2
- Funding dependency concentration: 2%
- Multi-hop pressure: 22/100
Observed sources later reappear as return destinations, which reduces legibility and suggests recirculating flow rather than clean one-direction settlement.
Offsetting factors considered
- Established history. Wallet age: 7.1y (observed)
- Observable activity present. Transfers observed: 73
- Moderately distributed counterparties. Unique counterparties observed: 62
Sanctioned counterparty interactions
0x04dba1194ee10112fe6c3207c0687def0e78bacf↗0x04dba1194ee10112fe6c3207c0687def0e78bacf· OFAC SDN-listed address · OFAC_SDNOFAC SDN ETH list (maintained mirror); not present in truncated CSV0x502371699497d08d5339c870851898d6d72521dd↗0x502371699497d08d5339c870851898d6d72521dd· OFAC SDN-listed address · OFAC_SDNOFAC SDN ETH list (maintained mirror); not present in truncated CSV0x83e5bc4ffa856bb84bb88581f5dd62a433a25e0d↗0x83e5bc4ffa856bb84bb88581f5dd62a433a25e0d· OFAC SDN-listed address · OFAC_SDNOFAC SDN ETH list (maintained mirror); not present in truncated CSV0x08b2efdcdb8822efe5ad0eae55517cf5dc544251↗0x08b2efdcdb8822efe5ad0eae55517cf5dc544251· OFAC SDN-listed address · OFAC_SDNOFAC SDN ETH list (maintained mirror); not present in truncated CSV0x0ee5067b06776a89ccc7dc8ee369984ad7db5e06↗0x0ee5067b06776a89ccc7dc8ee369984ad7db5e06· OFAC SDN-listed address · OFAC_SDNOFAC SDN ETH list (maintained mirror); not present in truncated CSV
Sensitivity — what would change this verdict
- Fresh activity could change this classification because the current signal is not recent.
- Improved data coverage for missing core metrics would likely improve confidence and may affect the trust score.
- The dormancy-reactivation pattern warrants direct inquiry, understanding what triggered resumed activity would substantially clarify the current behavioral picture.
Analyst notes
Loading…
Analyst notes
[no analyst notes added]