CredScore verdict
0x04db…bacfethereumScore
12
0 = max risk · 100 = clean
High riskEscalateConfidence:54%
Escalate for deeper review
CredScore sees a 7.1-year-old wallet with 73 transfers. High-confidence sanctions attribution and Sanctions-sensitive exposure context are severe enough to require escalation before any further interaction.
Wallet snapshot
Wallet age
7.1 years
Transfers observed
73
Last activity
1.1 years ago
Counterparties
62
Primary risk drivers
High-confidence sanctions attribution
This wallet itself is on a sanctions watchlist (per the curated registry or OFAC SDN sync).
Sanctions-sensitive attribution materially increases review urgency because legal and compliance context becomes critical.
Sanctions-sensitive exposure context
Sanctioned counterparty interactions observed: 4
Sanctions-sensitive attribution materially increases review urgency because legal and compliance context becomes critical.
Source return flow detected
Source return count: 2 · Repeated amount-band recirculation: 2 · Funding dependency concentration: 2% · Multi-hop pressure: 22/100
Observed sources later reappear as return destinations, which reduces legibility and suggests recirculating flow rather than clean one-direction settlement.
Sanctioned counterparty interactions
OFAC SDN-listed address
0x04dba1194ee10112fe6c3207c0687def0e78bacf ↗OFAC_SDN · OFAC SDN ETH list (maintained mirror); not present in truncated CSV
OFAC SDN-listed address
0x502371699497d08d5339c870851898d6d72521dd ↗OFAC_SDN · OFAC SDN ETH list (maintained mirror); not present in truncated CSV
OFAC SDN-listed address
0x83e5bc4ffa856bb84bb88581f5dd62a433a25e0d ↗OFAC_SDN · OFAC SDN ETH list (maintained mirror); not present in truncated CSV
OFAC SDN-listed address
0x08b2efdcdb8822efe5ad0eae55517cf5dc544251 ↗OFAC_SDN · OFAC SDN ETH list (maintained mirror); not present in truncated CSV
OFAC SDN-listed address
0x0ee5067b06776a89ccc7dc8ee369984ad7db5e06 ↗OFAC_SDN · OFAC SDN ETH list (maintained mirror); not present in truncated CSV
Offsetting factors
Established history
Wallet age: 7.1y (observed)
Observable activity present
Transfers observed: 73
Moderately distributed counterparties
Unique counterparties observed: 62
Analyst briefing
Executive Risk Verdict
This address presents elevated counterparty risk. High-confidence sanctions attribution and Sanctions-sensitive exposure context compose adverse signal severe enough to justify escalation under current coverage.
Decision Posture
Escalate for deeper review. A specific high-risk signal combination was detected (sanctions self). This pattern is materially more concerning than any individual flag in isolation and requires human context to resolve correctly.
Primary Risk Drivers
High-confidence sanctions attribution This wallet itself is on a sanctions watchlist (per the curated registry or OFAC SDN sync). Sanctions-sensitive attribution materially increases review urgency because legal and compliance context becomes critical.
Sanctions-sensitive exposure context
Sanctioned counterparty interactions observed: 4
Sanctions-sensitive attribution materially increases review urgency because legal and compliance context becomes critical.
Source return flow detected
Source return count: 2
Repeated amount-band recirculation: 2
Funding dependency concentration: 2%
Observed sources later reappear as return destinations, which reduces legibility and suggests recirculating flow rather than clean one-direction settlement.
Offsetting Factors
Established history Wallet age: 7.1y (observed)
Observable activity present
Transfers observed: 73
Moderately distributed counterparties
Unique counterparties observed: 62
Behavior Distribution
Attributed interactions: 100% of observed activity, but only 0% resolved with high confidence, the remainder are unlabeled contract interactions, which is opacity rather than meaningful attribution coverage. High-confidence attributed interactions: 0% of observed activity.
Confidence Statement
Overall assessment confidence is moderate (54%), reflecting partial coverage with usable but still incomplete behavioral signal.
Sensitivity notes
Fresh activity could change this classification because the current signal is not recent.
Improved data coverage for missing core metrics would likely improve confidence and may affect the trust score.
The dormancy-reactivation pattern warrants direct inquiry, understanding what triggered resumed activity would substantially clarify the current behavioral picture.
For analysts
Generate a Defensible Verdict Report — engine version + timestamp baked in, exportable as PDF or copy-pasted as Markdown into a SAR narrative or case file.
Run your own wallet through CredScore
Deterministic Ethereum wallet risk scoring with a full audit trail. Every signal has an explicit numeric weight, output is reproducible. Paste any wallet to see your own verdict.
First analysis is free, no credit card. Or see pricing.
Shared Jul 11, 2026