CredScore Defensible Verdict Report
Verdict on 0xc810…86fc ethereum
0xc8103e6180e59b09c501676a756c742b8ae086fc
Verdict
Score
24/100
0 = maximum risk · 100 = clean
Tier
High
Decision posture
Escalate
Confidence
36%
Low — thin signal, verify with your other tools
Escalate for deeper review
Executive summary
CredScore sees a 10-day-old wallet with at least 173 transfers. Circular funding pattern and High activity with limited history are severe enough to require escalation before any further interaction.
Wallet snapshot at analysis time
Transfers observed: 173
Wallet age: 0.0 years (10 days)
Last activity: 1 days ago
Unique counterparties: 35
Sanctions exposure count: 0
Mixer-like interactions: 0
Bridge-like interactions: 0
Primary risk drivers
- Circular funding patternhigh
- Circular loop count: 5
- Source return count: 5
- Linked recirculating counterparties: 1
- Bidirectional cluster count: 3
Funds appear to move out and then return through a narrow set of counterparties within bounded windows. This can be consistent with circular funding, staged routing, or internal treasury cycling and should be reviewed directly.
- High activity with limited historymedium
- Transfers observed: At least 173
- History cap: observed count may be a lower bound (cap 500)
High activity in a newly observed wallet can indicate burst behavior that deserves closer review, especially when there is not yet enough time depth to normalize the pattern.
- History capped by fetch limitmedium
- Transfers observed: At least 173
- History cap: observed count may be a lower bound (cap 500)
Incomplete transfer coverage reduces confidence because observed totals may be lower bounds.
Offsetting factors considered
- Moderately distributed counterparties. Unique counterparties observed: 35
- Recognizable exchange or protocol context. Observed label: Metamask Swaps; Observed label: 1inch Router; Observed label: universal-router interaction
- Recognizable protocol attribution. Observed protocol: Wrapped Ether (WETH); Observed protocol: Uniswap V2 Router; Observed protocol: metamask
Sensitivity — what would change this verdict
- Improved transaction coverage could materially change activity-based interpretation and increase confidence.
- As more history accumulates, this address may stabilize into a clearer behavioral profile.
- Improved data coverage for missing core metrics would likely improve confidence and may affect the trust score.
- Off-chain context would be particularly valuable here, the detected structural patterns raise interpretive ambiguity that on-chain data alone cannot resolve.
Observed entity / protocol context
Metamask Swaps1inch Routeruniversal-router interaction1inchmetamask
Analyst notes
Loading…
Analyst notes
[no analyst notes added]