CredScore verdict
0xc810…86fcethereum
Score
24
0 = max risk · 100 = clean
High riskEscalateConfidence:36%
Escalate for deeper review
CredScore sees a 10-day-old wallet with at least 173 transfers. Circular funding pattern and High activity with limited history are severe enough to require escalation before any further interaction.
Wallet snapshot
Wallet age
10 days
Transfers observed
173
Last activity
today
Counterparties
35
Primary risk drivers
Circular funding pattern
Circular loop count: 5 · Source return count: 5 · Linked recirculating counterparties: 1 · Bidirectional cluster count: 3
Funds appear to move out and then return through a narrow set of counterparties within bounded windows. This can be consistent with circular funding, staged routing, or internal treasury cycling and should be reviewed directly.
High activity with limited history
Transfers observed: At least 173 · History cap: observed count may be a lower bound (cap 500)
High activity in a newly observed wallet can indicate burst behavior that deserves closer review, especially when there is not yet enough time depth to normalize the pattern.
History capped by fetch limit
Transfers observed: At least 173 · History cap: observed count may be a lower bound (cap 500)
Incomplete transfer coverage reduces confidence because observed totals may be lower bounds.
Observed entity context
Labels
Metamask Swaps1inch Routeruniversal-router interaction1inchmetamask
Protocols
Wrapped Ether (WETH)Uniswap V2 Routermetamask1inchuniversal-router
Offsetting factors
Moderately distributed counterparties
Unique counterparties observed: 35
Recognizable exchange or protocol context
Observed label: Metamask Swaps · Observed label: 1inch Router · Observed label: universal-router interaction
Recognizable protocol attribution
Observed protocol: Wrapped Ether (WETH) · Observed protocol: Uniswap V2 Router · Observed protocol: metamask
Analyst briefing
Executive Risk Verdict
This address presents elevated counterparty risk. Circular funding pattern and High activity with limited history compose adverse signal severe enough to justify escalation under current coverage.
Decision Posture
Escalate for deeper review. This case should not be treated as routine. Sensitive exposure or materially adverse signal composition is strong enough to justify deeper investigation before proceeding.
Primary Risk Drivers
Circular funding pattern Circular loop count: 5 Source return count: 5 Linked recirculating counterparties: 1 Funds appear to move out and then return through a narrow set of counterparties within bounded windows. This can be consistent with circular funding, staged routing, or internal treasury cycling and should be reviewed directly.
High activity with limited history
Transfers observed: At least 173
History cap: observed count may be a lower bound (cap 500)
High activity in a newly observed wallet can indicate burst behavior that deserves closer review, especially when there is not yet enough time depth to normalize the pattern.
History capped by fetch limit
Transfers observed: At least 173
History cap: observed count may be a lower bound (cap 500)
Incomplete transfer coverage reduces confidence because observed totals may be lower bounds.
Offsetting Factors
Moderately distributed counterparties Unique counterparties observed: 35
Recognizable exchange or protocol context
Observed label: Metamask Swaps
Observed label: 1inch Router
Observed label: universal-router interaction
Recognizable protocol attribution
Observed protocol: Wrapped Ether (WETH)
Observed protocol: Uniswap V2 Router
Observed protocol: metamask
Structural Pattern Observations
Fan-out distribution (medium confidence) The observed flow pattern is consistent with fan-out distribution behavior and also carries additional review pressure from thin visibility, limited history, or sensitive exposure. This is not a misconduct finding, but it is not a routine pattern under current coverage.
Behavior Distribution
DEX-related interactions: 13% of observed activity. Router / aggregator interactions: 8% of observed activity. Attributed interactions: 100% of observed activity, but only 6% resolved with high confidence, the remainder are unlabeled contract interactions, which is opacity rather than meaningful attribution coverage. High-confidence attributed interactions: 6% of observed activity.
Observed Entity / Protocol Context
Metamask Swaps 1inch Router universal-router interaction 1inch metamask
Observed Protocol Attribution
Wrapped Ether (WETH) Uniswap V2 Router metamask 1inch universal-router
Confidence Statement
Overall assessment confidence is low (36%), constrained by limited coverage, short history, or sparse behavioral signal.
Sensitivity notes
Improved transaction coverage could materially change activity-based interpretation and increase confidence.
As more history accumulates, this address may stabilize into a clearer behavioral profile.
Improved data coverage for missing core metrics would likely improve confidence and may affect the trust score.
Off-chain context would be particularly valuable here, the detected structural patterns raise interpretive ambiguity that on-chain data alone cannot resolve.
For analysts
Generate a Defensible Verdict Report — engine version + timestamp baked in, exportable as PDF or copy-pasted as Markdown into a SAR narrative or case file.
Open report →
Run your own wallet through CredScore

Deterministic Ethereum wallet risk scoring with a full audit trail. Every signal has an explicit numeric weight, output is reproducible. Paste any wallet to see your own verdict.

First analysis is free, no credit card. Or see pricing.
Shared Oct 11, 2026