Verdict on 0xa9d1…3e43 ethereum

CredScore sees a 3.3-year-old wallet with at least 206 transfers. Sanctions-sensitive exposure context and History capped by fetch limit are severe enough to require escalation before any further interaction.

Transfers observed: 206

Wallet age: 3.3 years (1202 days)

Last activity: 1085 days ago

Unique counterparties: 185

Sanctions exposure count: 1

Mixer-like interactions: 0

Bridge-like interactions: 0

1. Sanctions-sensitive exposure contexthighWhy this driver?
   • Sanctioned counterparty interactions observed: 1

   Sanctions-sensitive attribution materially increases review urgency because legal and compliance context becomes critical.

2. History capped by fetch limitmediumWhy this driver?
   • Transfers observed: At least 206
   • History cap: observed count may be a lower bound (cap 500)

   Incomplete transfer coverage reduces confidence because observed totals may be lower bounds.

3. Balance unavailablemediumWhy this driver?
   • Native balance: Unknown

   Missing core metrics reduce confidence and increase the chance of misclassification.

• Established history. Wallet age: 3.3y (observed)Why?
• Recognizable protocol attribution. Observed protocol: USDT contractWhy?

• 0xac4cc4b68ea24bbfaac8fd127b67ed445accce22 ↗0xac4cc4b68ea24bbfaac8fd127b67ed445accce22 · ALARCON PALOMARES · OFAC_SDN
  Synced from OFAC SDN CSV

• Improved transaction coverage could materially change activity-based interpretation and increase confidence.
• Fresh activity could change this classification because the current signal is not recent.
• Improved data coverage for missing core metrics would likely improve confidence and may affect the trust score.