CredScore verdict
0xa9d1…3e43ethereumScore
21
0 = max risk · 100 = clean
High riskEscalateConfidence:34%
Escalate for deeper review
CredScore sees a 3.3-year-old wallet with at least 206 transfers. Sanctions-sensitive exposure context and History capped by fetch limit are severe enough to require escalation before any further interaction.
Wallet snapshot
Wallet age
3.3 years
Transfers observed
206
Last activity
3.0 years ago
Counterparties
185
Primary risk drivers
Sanctions-sensitive exposure context
Sanctioned counterparty interactions observed: 1
Sanctions-sensitive attribution materially increases review urgency because legal and compliance context becomes critical.
History capped by fetch limit
Transfers observed: At least 206 · History cap: observed count may be a lower bound (cap 500)
Incomplete transfer coverage reduces confidence because observed totals may be lower bounds.
Balance unavailable
Native balance: Unknown
Missing core metrics reduce confidence and increase the chance of misclassification.
Sanctioned counterparty interactions
Observed entity context
Protocols
USDT contract
Offsetting factors
Established history
Wallet age: 3.3y (observed)
Recognizable protocol attribution
Observed protocol: USDT contract
Analyst briefing
Executive Risk Verdict
This address presents elevated counterparty risk. Sanctions-sensitive exposure context and History capped by fetch limit compose adverse signal severe enough to justify escalation under current coverage.
Decision Posture
Escalate for deeper review. A specific high-risk signal combination was detected (sanctions exposure). This pattern is materially more concerning than any individual flag in isolation and requires human context to resolve correctly.
Primary Risk Drivers
Sanctions-sensitive exposure context Sanctioned counterparty interactions observed: 1 Sanctions-sensitive attribution materially increases review urgency because legal and compliance context becomes critical.
History capped by fetch limit
Transfers observed: At least 206
History cap: observed count may be a lower bound (cap 500)
Incomplete transfer coverage reduces confidence because observed totals may be lower bounds.
Balance unavailable
Native balance: Unknown
Missing core metrics reduce confidence and increase the chance of misclassification.
Offsetting Factors
Established history Wallet age: 3.3y (observed)
Recognizable protocol attribution
Observed protocol: USDT contract
Behavior Distribution
Attributed interactions: 100% of observed activity, but only 0% resolved with high confidence, the remainder are unlabeled contract interactions, which is opacity rather than meaningful attribution coverage. High-confidence attributed interactions: 0% of observed activity.
Observed Protocol Attribution
USDT contract
Confidence Statement
Overall assessment confidence is low (34%), constrained by limited coverage, short history, or sparse behavioral signal.
Sensitivity notes
Improved transaction coverage could materially change activity-based interpretation and increase confidence.
Fresh activity could change this classification because the current signal is not recent.
Improved data coverage for missing core metrics would likely improve confidence and may affect the trust score.
For analysts
Generate a Defensible Verdict Report — engine version + timestamp baked in, exportable as PDF or copy-pasted as Markdown into a SAR narrative or case file.
Run your own wallet through CredScore
Deterministic Ethereum wallet risk scoring with a full audit trail. Every signal has an explicit numeric weight, output is reproducible. Paste any wallet to see your own verdict.
First analysis is free, no credit card. Or see pricing.
Shared Jul 13, 2026