CredScore Defensible Verdict Report
Verdict on 0x2eee…716f ethereum
0x2eee951f0f8c70e3185640b77686a2361916716f
Verdict
Score
65/100
0 = maximum risk · 100 = clean
Tier
Medium
Decision posture
Review
Confidence
62%
Moderate — treat as directional
Review before proceeding
Executive summary
CredScore sees a 3.2-year-old wallet with at least 501 transfers. History capped by fetch limit and High inbound value concentration warrant manual review before this case is treated as routine. Observed entity context: USDT Token, USDC Token.
Wallet snapshot at analysis time
Transfers observed: 501
Wallet age: 3.2 years (1180 days)
Last activity: 474 days ago
Unique counterparties: 105
Sanctions exposure count: 0
Mixer-like interactions: 0
Bridge-like interactions: 0
Primary risk drivers
- History capped by fetch limitmedium
- Transfers observed: At least 501
- History cap: observed count may be a lower bound (cap 500)
Incomplete transfer coverage reduces confidence because observed totals may be lower bounds.
- High inbound value concentrationmedium
- Single source supplied 92% of inbound ETH value
- Distinct inbound counterparties (all assets): 101
A large share of inbound value is concentrated in a few transfers, which can indicate a single large unexplained windfall.
- Repeated amount-band recirculationmedium
- Source return count: 1
- Repeated amount-band recirculation: 17
- Funding dependency concentration: 13%
- Multi-hop pressure: 6/100
Repeated reuse of the same transfer size bands across a narrow routing set can indicate mechanical flow or recirculation rather than broad organic usage.
Offsetting factors considered
- Established history. Wallet age: 3.2y (observed)
- Material attribution coverage. Attributed interaction share: 100% (35% high-confidence)
- High-confidence label coverage. High-confidence attributed share: 35%
Sanctioned counterparty interactions
0xd8500c631dc32fa18645b7436344a99e4825e10e↗0xd8500c631dc32fa18645b7436344a99e4825e10e· GARANTEX EUROPE OU · OFAC_SDNSynced from OFAC SDN CSV
Sensitivity — what would change this verdict
- Improved transaction coverage could materially change activity-based interpretation and increase confidence.
- Fresh activity could change this classification because the current signal is not recent.
- Improved data coverage for missing core metrics would likely improve confidence and may affect the trust score.
Observed entity / protocol context
USDT TokenUSDC Tokencirclemakertether
Analyst notes
Loading…
Analyst notes
[no analyst notes added]