CredScore verdict
0x2eee…716fethereumScore
65
0 = max risk · 100 = clean
Medium riskReviewConfidence:62%
Review before proceeding
CredScore sees a 3.2-year-old wallet with at least 501 transfers. History capped by fetch limit and High inbound value concentration warrant manual review before this case is treated as routine. Observed entity context: USDT Token, USDC Token.
Wallet snapshot
Wallet age
3.2 years
Transfers observed
501
Last activity
1.3 years ago
Counterparties
105
Primary risk drivers
History capped by fetch limit
Transfers observed: At least 501 · History cap: observed count may be a lower bound (cap 500)
Incomplete transfer coverage reduces confidence because observed totals may be lower bounds.
High inbound value concentration
Single source supplied 92% of inbound ETH value · Distinct inbound counterparties (all assets): 101
A large share of inbound value is concentrated in a few transfers, which can indicate a single large unexplained windfall.
Repeated amount-band recirculation
Source return count: 1 · Repeated amount-band recirculation: 17 · Funding dependency concentration: 13% · Multi-hop pressure: 6/100
Repeated reuse of the same transfer size bands across a narrow routing set can indicate mechanical flow or recirculation rather than broad organic usage.
Sanctioned counterparty interactions
Observed entity context
Labels
USDT TokenUSDC Tokencirclemakertether
Protocols
tetherUSDT contractcirclemaker
Offsetting factors
Established history
Wallet age: 3.2y (observed)
Material attribution coverage
Attributed interaction share: 100% (35% high-confidence)
High-confidence label coverage
High-confidence attributed share: 35%
Analyst briefing
Executive Risk Verdict
This 3.2-year-old address presents moderate counterparty risk. The leading concerns are History capped by fetch limit and High inbound value concentration, which warrant manual review before this case is treated as routine.
Decision Posture
Review before proceeding. This case is not an automatic stop, but the current signal mix or confidence level is not strong enough to treat it as routine without human review.
Primary Risk Drivers
History capped by fetch limit Transfers observed: At least 501 History cap: observed count may be a lower bound (cap 500) Incomplete transfer coverage reduces confidence because observed totals may be lower bounds.
High inbound value concentration
Single source supplied 92% of inbound ETH value
Distinct inbound counterparties (all assets): 101
A large share of inbound value is concentrated in a few transfers, which can indicate a single large unexplained windfall.
Repeated amount-band recirculation
Source return count: 1
Repeated amount-band recirculation: 17
Funding dependency concentration: 13%
Repeated reuse of the same transfer size bands across a narrow routing set can indicate mechanical flow or recirculation rather than broad organic usage.
Offsetting Factors
Established history Wallet age: 3.2y (observed)
Material attribution coverage
Attributed interaction share: 100% (35% high-confidence)
High-confidence label coverage
High-confidence attributed share: 35%
Behavior Distribution
Attributed interactions: 100% of observed activity. High-confidence attributed interactions: 35% of observed activity.
Observed Entity / Protocol Context
USDT Token USDC Token circle maker tether
Observed Protocol Attribution
tether USDT contract circle maker
Confidence Statement
Overall assessment confidence is moderate (62%), reflecting partial coverage with usable but still incomplete behavioral signal.
Sensitivity notes
Improved transaction coverage could materially change activity-based interpretation and increase confidence.
Fresh activity could change this classification because the current signal is not recent.
Improved data coverage for missing core metrics would likely improve confidence and may affect the trust score.
For analysts
Generate a Defensible Verdict Report — engine version + timestamp baked in, exportable as PDF or copy-pasted as Markdown into a SAR narrative or case file.
Run your own wallet through CredScore
Deterministic Ethereum wallet risk scoring with a full audit trail. Every signal has an explicit numeric weight, output is reproducible. Paste any wallet to see your own verdict.
First analysis is free, no credit card. Or see pricing.
Shared Jul 12, 2026