ethereum
0xc8103e6180e59b09c501676a756c742b8ae086fc
Analyzed by the CredScore behavioral risk engine on . Engine version 1.0.0.
Score
24/100
0 clean · 100 max risk
Tier
High risk
CredScore banding
Decision
Escalate
Recommended analyst disposition
Confidence
36%
Low — thin signal
Escalate for deeper review
Ask about this wallet
Try
Deterministic. Every answer is a lookup on a specific field on the verdict payload — no LLM, no hallucinations. Sources shown per answer.
CredScore Copilot
LLM-assisted investigation on this verdict. BYOK — your key stays in your browser, never touches our servers.
Bring your own Anthropic (Claude) or OpenAI key. Click Configure key to add one — it's stored only in your browser and used to call the provider directly from this page. Zero CredScore-side cost, zero PII on our servers.
Summary
CredScore sees a 10-day-old wallet with at least 173 transfers. Circular funding pattern and High activity with limited history are severe enough to require escalation before any further interaction.
Wallet snapshot at analysis time
Transfers observed
173
Wallet age
0.0 years
10 days
Last activity
1 days ago
Unique counterparties
35
Sanctions exposure
0
Mixer-like interactions
0
Bridge-like interactions
0
Primary risk drivers (3)
Circular funding pattern
high- Circular loop count: 5
- Source return count: 5
- Linked recirculating counterparties: 1
- Bidirectional cluster count: 3
Funds appear to move out and then return through a narrow set of counterparties within bounded windows. This can be consistent with circular funding, staged routing, or internal treasury cycling and should be reviewed directly.
High activity with limited history
medium- Transfers observed: At least 173
- History cap: observed count may be a lower bound (cap 500)
High activity in a newly observed wallet can indicate burst behavior that deserves closer review, especially when there is not yet enough time depth to normalize the pattern.
History capped by fetch limit
medium- Transfers observed: At least 173
- History cap: observed count may be a lower bound (cap 500)
Incomplete transfer coverage reduces confidence because observed totals may be lower bounds.
Offsetting factors considered
- Moderately distributed counterparties. Unique counterparties observed: 35
- Recognizable exchange or protocol context. Observed label: Metamask Swaps; Observed label: 1inch Router; Observed label: universal-router interaction
- Recognizable protocol attribution. Observed protocol: Wrapped Ether (WETH); Observed protocol: Uniswap V2 Router; Observed protocol: metamask
Other high risk verdicts on ethereum
This verdict is a forensic snapshot as of the analysis timestamp above. Subsequent on-chain activity is not reflected until the wallet is re-analyzed. CredScore’s output is decision support based on public on-chain activity and does not constitute a final compliance determination.