Wallets/0xd1ea82…2678ea
Ethereum

0xd1ea823d421e0c829ee11f772af487fd352678ea

Analyzed by the CredScore behavioral risk engine on . Engine version unspecified.

Score
36/100
0 clean · 100 max risk
Tier
High risk
CredScore banding
Decision
Escalate
Recommended analyst disposition
Confidence
74%
Moderate — directional
Escalate for deeper review
Open Defensible Verdict Report →View investigation graphTrace money flowRelated walletsBehavioral watermark ✦Analyze another wallet
Ask about this wallet
Try
Deterministic. Every answer is a lookup on a specific field on the verdict payload — no LLM, no hallucinations. Sources shown per answer.
CredScore Copilot
LLM-assisted investigation on this verdict. BYOK — your key stays in your browser, never touches our servers.
Bring your own Anthropic (Claude) or OpenAI key. Click Configure key to add one — it's stored only in your browser and used to call the provider directly from this page. Zero CredScore-side cost, zero PII on our servers.
Summary

CredScore sees a 8-day-old wallet with 250 transfers. High activity with limited history and High inbound value concentration are severe enough to require escalation before any further interaction.

Wallet snapshot at analysis time
Transfers observed
250
Wallet age
0.0 years
8 days
Last activity
5 days ago
Unique counterparties
51
Sanctions exposure
0
Mixer-like interactions
0
Bridge-like interactions
0
Primary risk drivers (3)
High activity with limited history
medium
  • Transfers observed: 250
High activity in a newly observed wallet can indicate burst behavior that deserves closer review, especially when there is not yet enough time depth to normalize the pattern.
High inbound value concentration
medium
  • Single source supplied >99% of inbound ETH value
  • Distinct inbound counterparties (all assets): 27
A large share of inbound value is concentrated in a few transfers, which can indicate a single large unexplained windfall.
Repeated amount-band recirculation
medium
  • Source return count: 1
  • Repeated amount-band recirculation: 19
  • Funding dependency concentration: 32%
  • Multi-hop pressure: 22/100
Repeated reuse of the same transfer size bands across a narrow routing set can indicate mechanical flow or recirculation rather than broad organic usage.
Offsetting factors considered
  • Observable activity present. Transfers observed: 250
  • Moderately distributed counterparties. Unique counterparties observed: 51
  • Recognizable exchange or protocol context. Observed label: metamask; Observed label: tether; Observed label: Metamask Swaps
Other high risk verdicts on Ethereum
0xe6ec0d…61c961
11High risk
0xdd28fd…f83cb7
12High risk
0x5a5444…3891ca
0High risk
This verdict is a forensic snapshot as of the analysis timestamp above. Subsequent on-chain activity is not reflected until the wallet is re-analyzed. CredScore’s output is decision support based on public on-chain activity and does not constitute a final compliance determination.
Sign up to monitor this wallet →How the engine works