Ethereum
Behavioral watermarkMOONSHOT · v1

0xfd22004806a6846ea67ad883356be810f0428793

The wallet’s 20-dimensional behavioral fingerprint, and the wallets in CredScore’s corpus with the most similar operational shape. High similarity across wallets with different addresses, chains, or attribution suggests the same actor, service, or laundering ring — even when no labels overlap.

Fingerprint for this wallet · 100% coverage
Wallet age
94
Transfer volume
79
Activity rate
4
Counterparty breadth
61
Counterparty concentration
51
Counterparty entropy
64
Inbound share
62
Rapid-inflow burstiness
3
Rapid-outflow burstiness
30
Mixer exposure
0
Bridge exposure
0
Exchange exposure
0
DEX exposure
0
Aggregator exposure
0
Protocol exposure
58
Attribution coverage
22
Zero-value transfer ratio
28
Recency (dormancy)
0
Self-transfer ratio
0
Top inbound source share
83
Closest matches in the CredScore corpus (10)
92%
similarity
ethereumhighscore 0
0x6a1544…0e41ed
Most alike: Mixer exposure, DEX exposure, Aggregator exposure
Diverges on: Attribution coverage, Counterparty entropy, Inbound share
92%
similarity
Ethereumlowscore 77
0x11e485…518dda
Most alike: Mixer exposure, Aggregator exposure, Exchange exposure
Diverges on: Counterparty concentration, Protocol exposure, Counterparty entropy
90%
similarity
ethereumhighscore 0
0xdcbeff…643193
Most alike: Aggregator exposure, Exchange exposure, Self-transfer ratio
Diverges on: Attribution coverage, Counterparty entropy, Protocol exposure
89%
similarity
ethereummediumscore 54
0xa0d52f…9a250e
Most alike: Mixer exposure, Exchange exposure, Self-transfer ratio
Diverges on: Attribution coverage, Protocol exposure, Counterparty concentration
89%
similarity
ethereumhighscore 0
0xed6e0a…bad921
Most alike: Bridge exposure, Exchange exposure, Aggregator exposure
Diverges on: Attribution coverage, Inbound share, Counterparty concentration
89%
similarity
ethereumhighscore 12
0x9be599…a15573
Most alike: Mixer exposure, Bridge exposure, Self-transfer ratio
Diverges on: Attribution coverage, Counterparty concentration, Counterparty entropy
89%
similarity
ethereumhighscore 12
0xd5ed34…1ed510
Most alike: Mixer exposure, Bridge exposure, DEX exposure
Diverges on: Attribution coverage, Inbound share, Recency (dormancy)
89%
similarity
Ethereumhighscore 12Lazarus Group (Ronin Bridge Hack)
0x098b71…3e2f96
Most alike: Mixer exposure, Exchange exposure, Aggregator exposure
Diverges on: Attribution coverage, Protocol exposure, Counterparty entropy
89%
similarity
ethereumhighscore 12
0x4f47bc…96270c
Most alike: Mixer exposure, Aggregator exposure, Self-transfer ratio
Diverges on: Attribution coverage, Recency (dormancy), Counterparty entropy
88%
similarity
ethereumlowscore 87
0x267be1…4ffdc0
Most alike: Mixer exposure, Bridge exposure, DEX exposure
Diverges on: Attribution coverage, Protocol exposure, Counterparty entropy
How the fingerprint works. Twenty behavioral dimensions (wallet age, transfer volume, activity rate, counterparty breadth, timing patterns, protocol mix, dormancy, self-ratio, etc.) are normalized to 0-1 and stored as a vector per wallet. Similarity is cosine distance in that space. Dimensions are pattern metrics only — score, tier, and sanctions counts are excluded to keep the fingerprint from becoming circular. Read the technical primitive at /whitepaper.