0xea9fccb3ea820f080f38e9c49fc1a201066010c7

Every wallet CredScore has a public verdict on, ranked by shared characteristics with this one. Strong signal comes from shared sanctioned counterparties (co-investigation candidates), medium from overlapping entity labels (shared tooling), weak from behavioral fingerprint match.

Medium signal — overlapping entity labels 5

These wallets use overlapping sets of protocols and tools. Weaker than co-sanction but useful for tooling-cluster analysis.

ethereumMedium

0xa0d52f…9a250e

54review

2 shared labelsfingerprint match

EthereumHigh

0xe6ec0d…61c961

11escalate

2 shared labels

EthereumHigh

0x5a5444…3891ca

0escalate

2 shared labels

EthereumHigh

0xd1ea82…2678ea

36escalate

2 shared labels

ethereumHigh

0x998a7f…b27137

30escalate

2 shared labels

Behavioral fingerprint matches 2

Same tier, posture, and chain — a similar behavioral shape. Useful when you're looking for wallets that pattern-match this verdict.

EthereumMedium

0x115131…9fe30f

47review

1 shared labelfingerprint match

EthereumMedium

0xfd2200…428793

45review

1 shared labelfingerprint match

Coverage. This related-wallets search runs over the public shared_analyses corpus (verdicts anyone in the CredScore user base has published). Chainalysis-style chain-wide clustering would run over every wallet on the chain, not just verdicts — that scale requires infrastructure investment documented on the engine roadmap. Every hit here is a real verdict.